Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship

Granting agencies often require cross-disciplinary team composition to be competitive for funding. However, to what extent do research teams have cross-disciplinary authorships after they win an award, given that grants are not contracts? This mixed-method study examined the degree to which cross-di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chelsea Basore, Susan Mohammed, Bruce Tirrell, Jacqueline Marhefka, Katherine Hamilton, Tianyi Zhang, Carri Davis, Howard Hong, Xueyi Liao, Grace Miller
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1400595/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841540160583368704
author Chelsea Basore
Susan Mohammed
Bruce Tirrell
Jacqueline Marhefka
Katherine Hamilton
Tianyi Zhang
Carri Davis
Howard Hong
Xueyi Liao
Grace Miller
author_facet Chelsea Basore
Susan Mohammed
Bruce Tirrell
Jacqueline Marhefka
Katherine Hamilton
Tianyi Zhang
Carri Davis
Howard Hong
Xueyi Liao
Grace Miller
author_sort Chelsea Basore
collection DOAJ
description Granting agencies often require cross-disciplinary team composition to be competitive for funding. However, to what extent do research teams have cross-disciplinary authorships after they win an award, given that grants are not contracts? This mixed-method study examined the degree to which cross-disciplinary composition translated into cross-disciplinary authorship in grant-funded teams and the factors motivating cross-disciplinary collaboration. We found that after receiving a grant award, nearly 90% of investigators chose to collaborate across disciplines, with 80% working with researchers from fields very different from their own. Interviews uncovered facilitators and hindrances to continued collaboration. Facilitators included strong interpersonal relationships, shared goals, and openness to new ideas. Common hindrances involved funding shortages and limited face-to-face interactions. What defined success in cross-disciplinary collaboration were not only research outputs but learning opportunities, highlighting the intangible benefits of cross-disciplinary research. Researchers stressed the importance of integration and resource availability for deeper collaboration across disciplines.
format Article
id doaj-art-f0e4f118e8e242a9b989667eed32b20c
institution Kabale University
issn 2504-284X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Education
spelling doaj-art-f0e4f118e8e242a9b989667eed32b20c2025-01-14T06:10:29ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Education2504-284X2025-01-01910.3389/feduc.2024.14005951400595Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorshipChelsea Basore0Susan Mohammed1Bruce Tirrell2Jacqueline Marhefka3Katherine Hamilton4Tianyi Zhang5Carri Davis6Howard Hong7Xueyi Liao8Grace Miller9Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesICF, Fairfax, VA, United StatesPennsylvania State Education Association, Harrisburg, PA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN, United StatesNew York University, New York, NY, United StatesGeorge Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United StatesGranting agencies often require cross-disciplinary team composition to be competitive for funding. However, to what extent do research teams have cross-disciplinary authorships after they win an award, given that grants are not contracts? This mixed-method study examined the degree to which cross-disciplinary composition translated into cross-disciplinary authorship in grant-funded teams and the factors motivating cross-disciplinary collaboration. We found that after receiving a grant award, nearly 90% of investigators chose to collaborate across disciplines, with 80% working with researchers from fields very different from their own. Interviews uncovered facilitators and hindrances to continued collaboration. Facilitators included strong interpersonal relationships, shared goals, and openness to new ideas. Common hindrances involved funding shortages and limited face-to-face interactions. What defined success in cross-disciplinary collaboration were not only research outputs but learning opportunities, highlighting the intangible benefits of cross-disciplinary research. Researchers stressed the importance of integration and resource availability for deeper collaboration across disciplines.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1400595/fullknowledge integrationresearch grantseducational diversityexpertise diversitysocial identity theoryinterdisciplinary teams
spellingShingle Chelsea Basore
Susan Mohammed
Bruce Tirrell
Jacqueline Marhefka
Katherine Hamilton
Tianyi Zhang
Carri Davis
Howard Hong
Xueyi Liao
Grace Miller
Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship
Frontiers in Education
knowledge integration
research grants
educational diversity
expertise diversity
social identity theory
interdisciplinary teams
title Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship
title_full Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship
title_fullStr Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship
title_full_unstemmed Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship
title_short Post-award grant collaboration: facilitators and hindrances to cross-disciplinary authorship
title_sort post award grant collaboration facilitators and hindrances to cross disciplinary authorship
topic knowledge integration
research grants
educational diversity
expertise diversity
social identity theory
interdisciplinary teams
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1400595/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chelseabasore postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT susanmohammed postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT brucetirrell postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT jacquelinemarhefka postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT katherinehamilton postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT tianyizhang postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT carridavis postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT howardhong postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT xueyiliao postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship
AT gracemiller postawardgrantcollaborationfacilitatorsandhindrancestocrossdisciplinaryauthorship