Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge

There is a growing interest in the recovery of valuable biomaterials from waste in line with reaping the benefits of a circular economy. Organic wastes, such as waste-activated sludge (WAS) and food waste (FW), contain a substantial amount of protein that can be recovered for various applications. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheruiyot Dennis, Seth Apollo, George Simba Nyamato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Chemistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/joch/6685869
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849426393261146112
author Cheruiyot Dennis
Seth Apollo
George Simba Nyamato
author_facet Cheruiyot Dennis
Seth Apollo
George Simba Nyamato
author_sort Cheruiyot Dennis
collection DOAJ
description There is a growing interest in the recovery of valuable biomaterials from waste in line with reaping the benefits of a circular economy. Organic wastes, such as waste-activated sludge (WAS) and food waste (FW), contain a substantial amount of protein that can be recovered for various applications. This study compared thermal alkaline and acid hydrolysis methods for their efficiencies in extracting protein from FW and WAS. The possibility of enhancing protein yield and quality through co-extraction of WAS and FW was also investigated. Response surface methodology was used to optimize the extraction process. Before extraction, WAS was purified by removing heavy metals using acid pretreatment. It was established that FW had 21.5 g/100 g protein, while WAS had 19.9 g/100 g protein. The two extraction methods had superior extraction for WAS as compared to FW. In addition to this, there was no significant increase in protein yield in the co-extraction of protein from the FW and WAS mixture. Furthermore, optimization using RSM showed that the optimal yield of 15.8 g/100 g was obtained at a pH of 13 and a temperature of 120°C, close to the experimental yield of 16.6 g/100 g WAS. Moreover, LC–MS analysis of the extracted protein showed that WAS had a good essential amino acid profile with threonine, lysine, leucine, methionine and valine in concentrations of 3.3, 2.7, 1.8, 1.1, and 2.7 g/100 g, respectively. Significantly, the level of threonine revealed the potential of beneficiation of WAS as an animal food supplement because threonine plays an important role in the synthesis of mucosal protein that lines and protects the intestinal tract as well as modulation of nutritional metabolism and macromolecular biosynthesis in animals. In addition to that, the ratio of the first limiting amino acids (lysine and methionine) met the standards for animal feed supplementation.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb1f81e0a1604c57ac496c4ff8ec58e4
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-9071
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Chemistry
spelling doaj-art-fb1f81e0a1604c57ac496c4ff8ec58e42025-08-20T03:29:26ZengWileyJournal of Chemistry2090-90712025-01-01202510.1155/joch/6685869Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated SludgeCheruiyot Dennis0Seth Apollo1George Simba Nyamato2Department of Physical SciencesDepartment of Pure and Applied ChemistryDepartment of Physical SciencesThere is a growing interest in the recovery of valuable biomaterials from waste in line with reaping the benefits of a circular economy. Organic wastes, such as waste-activated sludge (WAS) and food waste (FW), contain a substantial amount of protein that can be recovered for various applications. This study compared thermal alkaline and acid hydrolysis methods for their efficiencies in extracting protein from FW and WAS. The possibility of enhancing protein yield and quality through co-extraction of WAS and FW was also investigated. Response surface methodology was used to optimize the extraction process. Before extraction, WAS was purified by removing heavy metals using acid pretreatment. It was established that FW had 21.5 g/100 g protein, while WAS had 19.9 g/100 g protein. The two extraction methods had superior extraction for WAS as compared to FW. In addition to this, there was no significant increase in protein yield in the co-extraction of protein from the FW and WAS mixture. Furthermore, optimization using RSM showed that the optimal yield of 15.8 g/100 g was obtained at a pH of 13 and a temperature of 120°C, close to the experimental yield of 16.6 g/100 g WAS. Moreover, LC–MS analysis of the extracted protein showed that WAS had a good essential amino acid profile with threonine, lysine, leucine, methionine and valine in concentrations of 3.3, 2.7, 1.8, 1.1, and 2.7 g/100 g, respectively. Significantly, the level of threonine revealed the potential of beneficiation of WAS as an animal food supplement because threonine plays an important role in the synthesis of mucosal protein that lines and protects the intestinal tract as well as modulation of nutritional metabolism and macromolecular biosynthesis in animals. In addition to that, the ratio of the first limiting amino acids (lysine and methionine) met the standards for animal feed supplementation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/joch/6685869
spellingShingle Cheruiyot Dennis
Seth Apollo
George Simba Nyamato
Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge
Journal of Chemistry
title Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge
title_full Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge
title_fullStr Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge
title_full_unstemmed Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge
title_short Extraction, Characterization, and Optimization of Protein From Food Waste and Waste-Activated Sludge
title_sort extraction characterization and optimization of protein from food waste and waste activated sludge
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/joch/6685869
work_keys_str_mv AT cheruiyotdennis extractioncharacterizationandoptimizationofproteinfromfoodwasteandwasteactivatedsludge
AT sethapollo extractioncharacterizationandoptimizationofproteinfromfoodwasteandwasteactivatedsludge
AT georgesimbanyamato extractioncharacterizationandoptimizationofproteinfromfoodwasteandwasteactivatedsludge