A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools

Soft tissue elasticity is directly related to different stages of diseases and can be used for tissue identification during minimally invasive procedures. By palpating a tissue with a robot in a minimally invasive fashion force-displacement curves can be acquired. However, force-displacement curves...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grube S., Neidhardt M., Hermann A.-K., Sprenger J., Abdolazizi K., Latus S., Cyron C. J., Schlaefer A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2024-09-01
Series:Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2024-1077
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570468963450880
author Grube S.
Neidhardt M.
Hermann A.-K.
Sprenger J.
Abdolazizi K.
Latus S.
Cyron C. J.
Schlaefer A.
author_facet Grube S.
Neidhardt M.
Hermann A.-K.
Sprenger J.
Abdolazizi K.
Latus S.
Cyron C. J.
Schlaefer A.
author_sort Grube S.
collection DOAJ
description Soft tissue elasticity is directly related to different stages of diseases and can be used for tissue identification during minimally invasive procedures. By palpating a tissue with a robot in a minimally invasive fashion force-displacement curves can be acquired. However, force-displacement curves strongly depend on the tool geometry which is often complex in the case of medical tools. Hence, a tool calibration procedure is desired to directly map force-displacement curves to the corresponding tissue elasticity.We present an experimental setup for calibrating medical tools with a robot. First, we propose to estimate the elasticity of gelatin phantoms by spherical indentation with a state-of-the-art contact model. We estimate force-displacement curves for different gelatin elasticities and temperatures. Our experiments demonstrate that gelatin elasticity is highly dependent on temperature, which can lead to an elasticity offset if not considered. Second, we propose to use a more complex material model, e.g., a neural network, that can be trained with the determined elasticities. Considering the temperature of the gelatin sample we can represent different elasticities per phantom and thereby increase our training data.We report elasticity values ranging from 10 to 40 kPa for a 10% gelatin phantom, depending on temperature.
format Article
id doaj-art-f09b7c71b5d94c2194aaf09a3cfff113
institution Kabale University
issn 2364-5504
language English
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
spelling doaj-art-f09b7c71b5d94c2194aaf09a3cfff1132025-02-02T15:45:00ZengDe GruyterCurrent Directions in Biomedical Engineering2364-55042024-09-011029910210.1515/cdbme-2024-1077A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical ToolsGrube S.0Neidhardt M.1Hermann A.-K.2Sprenger J.3Abdolazizi K.4Latus S.5Cyron C. J.6Schlaefer A.7Hamburg University of Technology, Institute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute for Continuum and Mate-rial Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute for Continuum and Mate-rial Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanyInstitute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology,Hamburg, GermanySoft tissue elasticity is directly related to different stages of diseases and can be used for tissue identification during minimally invasive procedures. By palpating a tissue with a robot in a minimally invasive fashion force-displacement curves can be acquired. However, force-displacement curves strongly depend on the tool geometry which is often complex in the case of medical tools. Hence, a tool calibration procedure is desired to directly map force-displacement curves to the corresponding tissue elasticity.We present an experimental setup for calibrating medical tools with a robot. First, we propose to estimate the elasticity of gelatin phantoms by spherical indentation with a state-of-the-art contact model. We estimate force-displacement curves for different gelatin elasticities and temperatures. Our experiments demonstrate that gelatin elasticity is highly dependent on temperature, which can lead to an elasticity offset if not considered. Second, we propose to use a more complex material model, e.g., a neural network, that can be trained with the determined elasticities. Considering the temperature of the gelatin sample we can represent different elasticities per phantom and thereby increase our training data.We report elasticity values ranging from 10 to 40 kPa for a 10% gelatin phantom, depending on temperature.https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2024-1077young’s modulusgelatin phantomstool calibrationpalpationsoft tissue
spellingShingle Grube S.
Neidhardt M.
Hermann A.-K.
Sprenger J.
Abdolazizi K.
Latus S.
Cyron C. J.
Schlaefer A.
A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
young’s modulus
gelatin phantoms
tool calibration
palpation
soft tissue
title A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools
title_full A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools
title_fullStr A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools
title_full_unstemmed A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools
title_short A Calibration Approach for Elasticity Estimation with Medical Tools
title_sort calibration approach for elasticity estimation with medical tools
topic young’s modulus
gelatin phantoms
tool calibration
palpation
soft tissue
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2024-1077
work_keys_str_mv AT grubes acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT neidhardtm acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT hermannak acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT sprengerj acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT abdolazizik acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT latuss acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT cyroncj acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT schlaefera acalibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT grubes calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT neidhardtm calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT hermannak calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT sprengerj calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT abdolazizik calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT latuss calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT cyroncj calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools
AT schlaefera calibrationapproachforelasticityestimationwithmedicaltools