Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study

Abstract BackgroundStationary bikes are used in numerous rehabilitation settings, with most offering limited functionalities and types of training. Smart technologies, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, bring new possibilities to achieve rehabilitation goals. Howeve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie Soulard, Dahlia Kairy, Roua Walha, Cyril Duclos, Sylvie Nadeau, Claudine Auger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2024-12-01
Series:JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
Online Access:https://rehab.jmir.org/2024/1/e64121
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556060007038976
author Julie Soulard
Dahlia Kairy
Roua Walha
Cyril Duclos
Sylvie Nadeau
Claudine Auger
author_facet Julie Soulard
Dahlia Kairy
Roua Walha
Cyril Duclos
Sylvie Nadeau
Claudine Auger
author_sort Julie Soulard
collection DOAJ
description Abstract BackgroundStationary bikes are used in numerous rehabilitation settings, with most offering limited functionalities and types of training. Smart technologies, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, bring new possibilities to achieve rehabilitation goals. However, it is important that these technologies meet the needs of users in order to improve their adoption in current practice. ObjectiveThis study aimed to collect professionals’ perspectives on the use of smart stationary bikes in rehabilitation. MethodsTwelve health professionals (age: mean 43.4, SD 10.1 years) completed an online questionnaire and participated in a semistructured interview regarding their needs and expectations before and after a 30-minute session with a smart bike prototype. ResultsA content analysis was performed with inductive coding. Seven main themes emerged: (1) bike functionalities (cycling assistance, asymmetric resistance, and forward and backward cycling), (2) interface between bike and users (simple, user-friendly, personalized, with written reminders during training), (3) feedback to users (user and performance data), (4) training programs (preprogrammed and personalized, and algorithmic programs), (5) user engagement (telerehabilitation, group sessions, music, and automatic suggestion of training), (6) the bike as a physical device (dimensions, comfort, setup, screen, etc), and (7) business model (various pricing strategies, training for professionals, and after-sales service). ConclusionsThis study provides an interpretive understanding of professionals’ perspectives regarding smart stationary bikes and is the first to identify the expectations of health professionals regarding the development of future bikes in rehabilitation.
format Article
id doaj-art-ee89ec3b11d045e9984d15371cedbe7e
institution Kabale University
issn 2369-2529
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
spelling doaj-art-ee89ec3b11d045e9984d15371cedbe7e2025-01-07T15:01:52ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies2369-25292024-12-0111e64121e6412110.2196/64121Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative StudyJulie Soulardhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8138-1447Dahlia Kairyhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-6607Roua Walhahttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-1998Cyril Ducloshttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5788-2396Sylvie Nadeauhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8501-457XClaudine Augerhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-2004 Abstract BackgroundStationary bikes are used in numerous rehabilitation settings, with most offering limited functionalities and types of training. Smart technologies, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, bring new possibilities to achieve rehabilitation goals. However, it is important that these technologies meet the needs of users in order to improve their adoption in current practice. ObjectiveThis study aimed to collect professionals’ perspectives on the use of smart stationary bikes in rehabilitation. MethodsTwelve health professionals (age: mean 43.4, SD 10.1 years) completed an online questionnaire and participated in a semistructured interview regarding their needs and expectations before and after a 30-minute session with a smart bike prototype. ResultsA content analysis was performed with inductive coding. Seven main themes emerged: (1) bike functionalities (cycling assistance, asymmetric resistance, and forward and backward cycling), (2) interface between bike and users (simple, user-friendly, personalized, with written reminders during training), (3) feedback to users (user and performance data), (4) training programs (preprogrammed and personalized, and algorithmic programs), (5) user engagement (telerehabilitation, group sessions, music, and automatic suggestion of training), (6) the bike as a physical device (dimensions, comfort, setup, screen, etc), and (7) business model (various pricing strategies, training for professionals, and after-sales service). ConclusionsThis study provides an interpretive understanding of professionals’ perspectives regarding smart stationary bikes and is the first to identify the expectations of health professionals regarding the development of future bikes in rehabilitation.https://rehab.jmir.org/2024/1/e64121
spellingShingle Julie Soulard
Dahlia Kairy
Roua Walha
Cyril Duclos
Sylvie Nadeau
Claudine Auger
Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
title Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study
title_full Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study
title_short Professionals’ Perspectives of Smart Stationary Bikes in Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study
title_sort professionals perspectives of smart stationary bikes in rehabilitation qualitative study
url https://rehab.jmir.org/2024/1/e64121
work_keys_str_mv AT juliesoulard professionalsperspectivesofsmartstationarybikesinrehabilitationqualitativestudy
AT dahliakairy professionalsperspectivesofsmartstationarybikesinrehabilitationqualitativestudy
AT rouawalha professionalsperspectivesofsmartstationarybikesinrehabilitationqualitativestudy
AT cyrilduclos professionalsperspectivesofsmartstationarybikesinrehabilitationqualitativestudy
AT sylvienadeau professionalsperspectivesofsmartstationarybikesinrehabilitationqualitativestudy
AT claudineauger professionalsperspectivesofsmartstationarybikesinrehabilitationqualitativestudy