Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools
Abstract Background Sales of commercial milk formula products (CMF) are rising rapidly. This study analysed key economic and environmental impacts CMF feeding in Indonesia, which are often overlooked in policy discussions despite their relevance. Methods We assessed the economic and environmental im...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | International Breastfeeding Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00732-6 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850190775090937856 |
|---|---|
| author | Nabila Nur Septiani Andini Pramono Tuan Thanh Nguyen Roger Mathisen Julie Smith |
| author_facet | Nabila Nur Septiani Andini Pramono Tuan Thanh Nguyen Roger Mathisen Julie Smith |
| author_sort | Nabila Nur Septiani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Sales of commercial milk formula products (CMF) are rising rapidly. This study analysed key economic and environmental impacts CMF feeding in Indonesia, which are often overlooked in policy discussions despite their relevance. Methods We assessed the economic and environmental impacts of CMF in Indonesia in 2020 using the Mothers’ Milk Tool (MMT), the Green Feeding Tool (GFT) and the Cost of Not Breastfeeding Tool (CONBF). We compared the estimated values from these tools with calculations based on Euromonitor data on CMF retail sales in Indonesia. Results In 2020, according to the MMT, women in Indonesia produced around 455 million litres of breastmilk for infants aged < 6 months, which had an estimated monetary value of US$45.5 billion. The MMT and GFT shows substantial economic losses from displacement of breastfeeding in Indonesia; 62–96 million litres of breastmilk were lost in 2020 compared to the biologically feasible potential. The GFT tool calculates a carbon footprint of 215–274 million kg of CO2 eq. and a water footprint of 93,037 million litres. The CONBF estimates that the annual cost to families of purchasing CMF for infants aged < 24 months was US$598.6 million. By comparison, Euromonitor retail sales data suggests that in 2020, the retail value of sales of CMF products targeting the age group 0–36 months was around US$2.25 billion. Euromonitor also reports 27,200 tonnes of CMF products targeting infants < 6 months were sold in Indonesia in 2020. We calculate a carbon footprint from these sales of 299–381 million kg CO2 eq. and a water footprint of 129,064 million litres, higher than the GFT estimate. Conclusions Breastfeeding’s economic importance to Indonesia far exceeds the retail value of CMF sales. Displacing breastfeeding carries high but largely undocumented economic and environmental costs. Losses are greater when measured as a food resource than as health costs, lost lives, or cognitive decline. Environmental impacts based on sales data are higher than those from survey data. Our findings and the discrepancies between tools reveal a critical gap in national statistics and highlight the need to recognise breast milk as an economically valuable, healthy, and sustainable national resource in Indonesia. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e3670d385b8b430787cfc0baa1a25e3e |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1746-4358 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-05-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Breastfeeding Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-e3670d385b8b430787cfc0baa1a25e3e2025-08-20T02:15:11ZengBMCInternational Breastfeeding Journal1746-43582025-05-0120111110.1186/s13006-025-00732-6Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk ToolsNabila Nur Septiani0Andini Pramono1Tuan Thanh Nguyen2Roger Mathisen3Julie Smith4IPB, IPB UniversityNational Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National UniversityAlive & Thrive, FHI 360 Global NutritionAlive & Thrive, FHI 360 Global NutritionCrawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National UniversityAbstract Background Sales of commercial milk formula products (CMF) are rising rapidly. This study analysed key economic and environmental impacts CMF feeding in Indonesia, which are often overlooked in policy discussions despite their relevance. Methods We assessed the economic and environmental impacts of CMF in Indonesia in 2020 using the Mothers’ Milk Tool (MMT), the Green Feeding Tool (GFT) and the Cost of Not Breastfeeding Tool (CONBF). We compared the estimated values from these tools with calculations based on Euromonitor data on CMF retail sales in Indonesia. Results In 2020, according to the MMT, women in Indonesia produced around 455 million litres of breastmilk for infants aged < 6 months, which had an estimated monetary value of US$45.5 billion. The MMT and GFT shows substantial economic losses from displacement of breastfeeding in Indonesia; 62–96 million litres of breastmilk were lost in 2020 compared to the biologically feasible potential. The GFT tool calculates a carbon footprint of 215–274 million kg of CO2 eq. and a water footprint of 93,037 million litres. The CONBF estimates that the annual cost to families of purchasing CMF for infants aged < 24 months was US$598.6 million. By comparison, Euromonitor retail sales data suggests that in 2020, the retail value of sales of CMF products targeting the age group 0–36 months was around US$2.25 billion. Euromonitor also reports 27,200 tonnes of CMF products targeting infants < 6 months were sold in Indonesia in 2020. We calculate a carbon footprint from these sales of 299–381 million kg CO2 eq. and a water footprint of 129,064 million litres, higher than the GFT estimate. Conclusions Breastfeeding’s economic importance to Indonesia far exceeds the retail value of CMF sales. Displacing breastfeeding carries high but largely undocumented economic and environmental costs. Losses are greater when measured as a food resource than as health costs, lost lives, or cognitive decline. Environmental impacts based on sales data are higher than those from survey data. Our findings and the discrepancies between tools reveal a critical gap in national statistics and highlight the need to recognise breast milk as an economically valuable, healthy, and sustainable national resource in Indonesia.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00732-6BreastfeedingCommercial milk formula (CMF)Cost of not breastfeedingGreen feedingEconomic costGreenhouse gases |
| spellingShingle | Nabila Nur Septiani Andini Pramono Tuan Thanh Nguyen Roger Mathisen Julie Smith Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools International Breastfeeding Journal Breastfeeding Commercial milk formula (CMF) Cost of not breastfeeding Green feeding Economic cost Greenhouse gases |
| title | Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools |
| title_full | Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools |
| title_fullStr | Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools |
| title_full_unstemmed | Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools |
| title_short | Economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in Indonesia: estimates and comparisons using the Cost of Not Breastfeeding, Green Feeding, and Mothers’ Milk Tools |
| title_sort | economic and environmental impacts of commercial milk formula in indonesia estimates and comparisons using the cost of not breastfeeding green feeding and mothers milk tools |
| topic | Breastfeeding Commercial milk formula (CMF) Cost of not breastfeeding Green feeding Economic cost Greenhouse gases |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-025-00732-6 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nabilanurseptiani economicandenvironmentalimpactsofcommercialmilkformulainindonesiaestimatesandcomparisonsusingthecostofnotbreastfeedinggreenfeedingandmothersmilktools AT andinipramono economicandenvironmentalimpactsofcommercialmilkformulainindonesiaestimatesandcomparisonsusingthecostofnotbreastfeedinggreenfeedingandmothersmilktools AT tuanthanhnguyen economicandenvironmentalimpactsofcommercialmilkformulainindonesiaestimatesandcomparisonsusingthecostofnotbreastfeedinggreenfeedingandmothersmilktools AT rogermathisen economicandenvironmentalimpactsofcommercialmilkformulainindonesiaestimatesandcomparisonsusingthecostofnotbreastfeedinggreenfeedingandmothersmilktools AT juliesmith economicandenvironmentalimpactsofcommercialmilkformulainindonesiaestimatesandcomparisonsusingthecostofnotbreastfeedinggreenfeedingandmothersmilktools |