Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This systematic review aimed to compare the effect of chitosan in smear layer removal with other commonly used chelators during root canal treatment. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Ex vivo studies performed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Ferreira-Reguera, Inês Ferreira, Irene Pina-Vaz, Benjamín Martín-Biedma, José Martín-Cruces
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/1/114
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588026945994752
author Ana Ferreira-Reguera
Inês Ferreira
Irene Pina-Vaz
Benjamín Martín-Biedma
José Martín-Cruces
author_facet Ana Ferreira-Reguera
Inês Ferreira
Irene Pina-Vaz
Benjamín Martín-Biedma
José Martín-Cruces
author_sort Ana Ferreira-Reguera
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and Objectives</i>: This systematic review aimed to compare the effect of chitosan in smear layer removal with other commonly used chelators during root canal treatment. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Ex vivo studies performed in non-endodontically treated extracted human permanent teeth with a fully formed apex, in which sodium hypochlorite was the main irrigant and chitosan was used as final irrigation to observe its capacity to remove the smear layer using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), were included. In addition, reviews, letters, opinion articles, conference abstracts, book chapters, or articles that did not use a control group were excluded. A literature search was undertaken without limits on time or language, until February 2024, in PubMed—MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and in the electronic archives of four endodontic journals. The risk of bias was evaluated by adapting the risk of bias assessment used in a previous study. Study selection, data collection, and synthesis were performed and the risk of bias was assessed by two independent reviewers. <i>Results</i>: Six studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. Four studies found chitosan to be as effective as EDTA and one paper showed it was more effective than EDTA and MTAD; however, one article found it to be comparable to citric acid. The overall risk of bias was medium. Quantitative analysis of the results was not possible due to the heterogeneity found between the study methodologies of the included articles. <i>Conclusions</i>: Within the limitations of this study, 0.2% chitosan may be considered as a promising irrigation solution when employed as a final irrigant in order to remove the smear layer. Nonetheless, a standardized protocol for the use of chelators in root canal treatment should be established in future studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1a4b81a3b984622a37311471a469233
institution Kabale University
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj-art-e1a4b81a3b984622a37311471a4692332025-01-24T13:40:40ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442025-01-0161111410.3390/medicina61010114Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo StudiesAna Ferreira-Reguera0Inês Ferreira1Irene Pina-Vaz2Benjamín Martín-Biedma3José Martín-Cruces4Faculty of Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Galicia, SpainFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-393 Porto, PortugalFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-393 Porto, PortugalFaculty of Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Galicia, SpainFaculty of Dentistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Galicia, Spain<i>Background and Objectives</i>: This systematic review aimed to compare the effect of chitosan in smear layer removal with other commonly used chelators during root canal treatment. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Ex vivo studies performed in non-endodontically treated extracted human permanent teeth with a fully formed apex, in which sodium hypochlorite was the main irrigant and chitosan was used as final irrigation to observe its capacity to remove the smear layer using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), were included. In addition, reviews, letters, opinion articles, conference abstracts, book chapters, or articles that did not use a control group were excluded. A literature search was undertaken without limits on time or language, until February 2024, in PubMed—MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and in the electronic archives of four endodontic journals. The risk of bias was evaluated by adapting the risk of bias assessment used in a previous study. Study selection, data collection, and synthesis were performed and the risk of bias was assessed by two independent reviewers. <i>Results</i>: Six studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included. Four studies found chitosan to be as effective as EDTA and one paper showed it was more effective than EDTA and MTAD; however, one article found it to be comparable to citric acid. The overall risk of bias was medium. Quantitative analysis of the results was not possible due to the heterogeneity found between the study methodologies of the included articles. <i>Conclusions</i>: Within the limitations of this study, 0.2% chitosan may be considered as a promising irrigation solution when employed as a final irrigant in order to remove the smear layer. Nonetheless, a standardized protocol for the use of chelators in root canal treatment should be established in future studies.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/1/114chitosansmear layerchelatorirrigantsystematic review
spellingShingle Ana Ferreira-Reguera
Inês Ferreira
Irene Pina-Vaz
Benjamín Martín-Biedma
José Martín-Cruces
Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies
Medicina
chitosan
smear layer
chelator
irrigant
systematic review
title Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies
title_full Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies
title_fullStr Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies
title_full_unstemmed Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies
title_short Chitosan’s Ability to Remove the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of Ex Vivo Studies
title_sort chitosan s ability to remove the smear layer a systematic review of ex vivo studies
topic chitosan
smear layer
chelator
irrigant
systematic review
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/61/1/114
work_keys_str_mv AT anaferreirareguera chitosansabilitytoremovethesmearlayerasystematicreviewofexvivostudies
AT inesferreira chitosansabilitytoremovethesmearlayerasystematicreviewofexvivostudies
AT irenepinavaz chitosansabilitytoremovethesmearlayerasystematicreviewofexvivostudies
AT benjaminmartinbiedma chitosansabilitytoremovethesmearlayerasystematicreviewofexvivostudies
AT josemartincruces chitosansabilitytoremovethesmearlayerasystematicreviewofexvivostudies