CYP2D6 polymorphisms and endoxifen concentration in Chinese patients with breast cancer

Abstract Background The plasma concentration of endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen, might be affected by different CYP2D6 genotypes in patients with breast cancer, but solid evidence is still lacking in Asian patients. This prospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cong Xue, Wei Yang, Anqi Hu, Caiyun He, Hai Liao, Meiting Chen, Xin An, Shusen Wang, Zhongyu Yuan, Fei Xu, Jun Tang, Haifeng Li, Su Li, Jianyong Shao, Yanxia Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13791-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The plasma concentration of endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen, might be affected by different CYP2D6 genotypes in patients with breast cancer, but solid evidence is still lacking in Asian patients. This prospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms and endoxifen plasma concentrations among Chinese patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen. Methods From August 2015 to June 2018, 110 patients with breast cancer were enrolled. CYP2D6 variant alleles and endoxifen plasma concentration were determined using Sanger sequencing and high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. Results The most frequent allele of CYP2D6 was *10 (56.4%). The most frequent genotype of CYP2D6 was *10/*10 (33%), *1/*10(28.2%) and *2/*10(14.5%). Sixty-four patients (58.2%) were Normal Metabolizers (NM), while 46 (41.8%) were Intermediate Metabolizers (IM). All patients except two had endoxifen concentrations above the threshold of 5.9ng/ml. The median endoxifen plasma concentrations for patients with CYP2D6 genotypes *1/*2 and *1/10 were higher compared to other genotypes (p = 0.012). The median endoxifen plasma concentration was higher in NM than in IM (18ng/ml vs. 13ng/ml, p = 0.0077). Patients with CYP2D6*10(T/T) had lower endoxifen concentrations than those with *10(C/T) and *10(C/C) but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in adverse events between patients in the NM and IM groups or between patients with the CYP2D6*10 (T/T) genotype and non-*10 (T/T) genotype. Conclusion Only CYP2D6 IMs and NMs were identified in this study. Almost all patients had the endoxifen concentrations above the threshold. The endoxifen plasma concentration was lower in CYP2D6 IMs than in NMs, but these variants did not compromise the adverse effects of tamoxifen in Asian patients with breast cancer. Trial registration The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of Sun YatSen University Cancer Center (Ethics approval number, B201506501,20160115).
ISSN:1471-2407