Hysteresis Modeling of Soft Pneumatic Actuators: An Experimental Review
Hysteresis is a nonlinear phenomenon found in many physical systems, including soft viscoelastic actuators, where it poses significant challenges to their application and performance. Consequently, developing accurate hysteresis models is essential for the effective design and optimization of soft a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-06-01
|
| Series: | Actuators |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0825/14/7/321 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Hysteresis is a nonlinear phenomenon found in many physical systems, including soft viscoelastic actuators, where it poses significant challenges to their application and performance. Consequently, developing accurate hysteresis models is essential for the effective design and optimization of soft actuators. Moreover, a reliable model can be used to design compensators that mitigate the negative effects of hysteresis, improving closed-loop control accuracy and expanding the applicability of soft actuators in robotics. Physics-based approaches for modeling hysteresis in soft actuators offer valuable insights into the underlying material behavior. Nevertheless, they are often highly complex, making them impractical for real-world applications. Instead, phenomenological models provide a more feasible solution by representing hysteresis through input–output mappings based on experimental data. To effectively fit these phenomenological models, it is essential to rely on sensing data collected from real actuators. In this context, the primary objective of this work is a comprehensive comparative evaluation of the efficiency and performance of representative phenomenological hysteresis models (e.g., Bouc–Wen and Prandtl-Ishlinskii) using experimental data obtained from a pneumatic bending actuator made of a viscoelastic material. This evaluation suggests that the Generalized Prandtl–Ishlinskii model achieves the highest modeling accuracy, while the Preisach model with a probabilistic density function formulation excels in terms of parameter compactness. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-0825 |