Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review

The aim was to assess the efficacy of ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for studies comparing ivermectin and moxidectin from inception to February 2024. The outcomes: elimination of infection or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cesar Henriquez-Camacho, Jose A. Pérez-Molina, Dora Buonfrate, Paola Rodari, Eduardo Gotuzzo, Benilde Luengo, María Nieves Plana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press
Series:Parasitology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031182024001215/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841525580592316416
author Cesar Henriquez-Camacho
Jose A. Pérez-Molina
Dora Buonfrate
Paola Rodari
Eduardo Gotuzzo
Benilde Luengo
María Nieves Plana
author_facet Cesar Henriquez-Camacho
Jose A. Pérez-Molina
Dora Buonfrate
Paola Rodari
Eduardo Gotuzzo
Benilde Luengo
María Nieves Plana
author_sort Cesar Henriquez-Camacho
collection DOAJ
description The aim was to assess the efficacy of ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for studies comparing ivermectin and moxidectin from inception to February 2024. The outcomes: elimination of infection or parasitological cure, mortality and serious adverse events. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi2 test for statistical heterogeneity and results of the I2 statistic. Two trials met the inclusion criteria that included 821 adult participants. Both studies were conducted in southeast Asia (Cambodia and Laos). Neither trial included immunocompromised patients. The mean age of the participants ranged from 40 to 45 years old, with a similar distribution of males and females. For all participants, S. stercoralis infection was confirmed by Baermann method. The evidence was moderate for parasitological cure rate. Certainty was downgraded by 1 level because of imprecision. Moxidectin was not inferior to ivermectin: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.36–1.25 (P = 0.21), I2 = 0%, 821 participants. No deaths were reported in either trial. One trial reported mild adverse events. In total, 153/726 (21%) participants had an adverse event. The most reported symptoms were abdominal pain and headache. There is evidence for moderate quality that moxidectin is non-inferior to, and as safe as ivermectin; however, more high-quality and well-designed trials are needed. For patients with some underlying immunosuppressive disorder, or in patients who are very young or very old, current data are insufficient to be recommended.
format Article
id doaj-art-db673bae5b604a728d2f80198f410501
institution Kabale University
issn 0031-1820
1469-8161
language English
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Parasitology
spelling doaj-art-db673bae5b604a728d2f80198f4105012025-01-17T09:42:28ZengCambridge University PressParasitology0031-18201469-81611710.1017/S0031182024001215Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic reviewCesar Henriquez-Camacho0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6714-5840Jose A. Pérez-Molina1Dora Buonfrate2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0108-6822Paola Rodari3Eduardo Gotuzzo4Benilde Luengo5María Nieves Plana6Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain Internal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario de Móstoles, Madrid, SpainNational Reference Centre for Imported Tropical Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain CIBERINFEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Infectious Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, ItalyDepartment of Infectious Tropical Diseases and Microbiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, ItalyFaculty of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, PeruResearch Unit, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid, SpainHealth Technology Assessment Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Universidad de Alcalá (IRYCIS), CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, SpainThe aim was to assess the efficacy of ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for studies comparing ivermectin and moxidectin from inception to February 2024. The outcomes: elimination of infection or parasitological cure, mortality and serious adverse events. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Chi2 test for statistical heterogeneity and results of the I2 statistic. Two trials met the inclusion criteria that included 821 adult participants. Both studies were conducted in southeast Asia (Cambodia and Laos). Neither trial included immunocompromised patients. The mean age of the participants ranged from 40 to 45 years old, with a similar distribution of males and females. For all participants, S. stercoralis infection was confirmed by Baermann method. The evidence was moderate for parasitological cure rate. Certainty was downgraded by 1 level because of imprecision. Moxidectin was not inferior to ivermectin: OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.36–1.25 (P = 0.21), I2 = 0%, 821 participants. No deaths were reported in either trial. One trial reported mild adverse events. In total, 153/726 (21%) participants had an adverse event. The most reported symptoms were abdominal pain and headache. There is evidence for moderate quality that moxidectin is non-inferior to, and as safe as ivermectin; however, more high-quality and well-designed trials are needed. For patients with some underlying immunosuppressive disorder, or in patients who are very young or very old, current data are insufficient to be recommended.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031182024001215/type/journal_articleivermectinmoxidectinparasitological cureStrongyloides stercoralis
spellingShingle Cesar Henriquez-Camacho
Jose A. Pérez-Molina
Dora Buonfrate
Paola Rodari
Eduardo Gotuzzo
Benilde Luengo
María Nieves Plana
Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review
Parasitology
ivermectin
moxidectin
parasitological cure
Strongyloides stercoralis
title Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review
title_full Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review
title_fullStr Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review
title_short Ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating Strongyloides stercoralis infection: a systematic review
title_sort ivermectin vs moxidectin for treating strongyloides stercoralis infection a systematic review
topic ivermectin
moxidectin
parasitological cure
Strongyloides stercoralis
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0031182024001215/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT cesarhenriquezcamacho ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview
AT joseaperezmolina ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview
AT dorabuonfrate ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview
AT paolarodari ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview
AT eduardogotuzzo ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview
AT benildeluengo ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview
AT marianievesplana ivermectinvsmoxidectinfortreatingstrongyloidesstercoralisinfectionasystematicreview