Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks

Abstract Background Developing region-specific dietary strategies is crucial for mitigating methane (CH4) emissions from yaks. However, there is a lack of tailored emission reduction strategies for yak production in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region. This study utilizes an in vitro rumen fermentation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian Zhang, Tongqing Guo, Xungang Wang, Lin Wei, Yalin Wang, Shanshan Li, Hongjin Liu, Na Zhao, Shixiao Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03817-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849761566722883584
author Qian Zhang
Tongqing Guo
Xungang Wang
Lin Wei
Yalin Wang
Shanshan Li
Hongjin Liu
Na Zhao
Shixiao Xu
author_facet Qian Zhang
Tongqing Guo
Xungang Wang
Lin Wei
Yalin Wang
Shanshan Li
Hongjin Liu
Na Zhao
Shixiao Xu
author_sort Qian Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Developing region-specific dietary strategies is crucial for mitigating methane (CH4) emissions from yaks. However, there is a lack of tailored emission reduction strategies for yak production in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region. This study utilizes an in vitro rumen fermentation technique (Based on the ANKOMRF gas production measurement system) to investigate the effects of different dietary interventions on CH4 production from regional yaks. The selected strategies—Sodium Nitrate solution, regional Medicago sativa L., and regional Helianthus tuberosus L.—were chosen for their potential to reduce CH4 production through various mechanisms: Sodium Nitrate as a methanogenesis inhibitor, Medicago sativa L. for its high nutritional value and its ability to modulate microbial fermentation, and Helianthus tuberosus L. due to its inulin content, which promotes beneficial microbial activity. These dietary interventions aim not only to reduce CH4 production but also to support rumen health and productivity. In addition, gas chromatography and microbial sequencing techniques were employed to identify the optimal emission reduction strategy for regional yaks and to elucidate the key factors influencing the efficacy of these strategies. Results The results indicate that supplementing the confined feeding ration (FR group) with Sodium Nitrate (12 mmol/L, FRN group), Medicago sativa L. (25%, FRM group), and Helianthus tuberosus L. (3%, FRH group) all have the effect of reducing CH4 production from yak rumen. Among these interventions, the FRM group exhibits the most significant reduction, with a decrease in rumen CH4 production by 42.76% compared to the FR group. The dry matter digestibility, total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), propionate, and butyrate levels in all groups were higher than those in the FR group. However, only the FRM group reached a significant level (P < 0.01). The pH values were significantly lower than those in the FR group (P < 0.01) across all groups. Each group exhibited distinct clustering patterns in bacterial and archaeal communities compared to the FR group (P < 0.05). The α diversity of bacterial communities was significantly lower than that of the FR group (P < 0.01), while the α diversity of archaeal communities was significantly higher than that of the FR group (P < 0.01). Taxa such as Lachnospiraceae, Clostridium, Treponema, Methanomicrobiaceae, Methanosphaera, and Methanoplanus were enriched in the FR group. Conclusions CH4 production from yak rumen were significantly negatively correlated with substrate crude protein (CP) levels, fermentation fluid TVFA levels, α diversity of archaeal communities, and the relative abundance of Selenomonas and Megasphaera in bacterial communities (P < 0.01). Conversely, CH4 production were significantly positively correlated with the relative abundance of Methanoplanus in archaeal communities (P < 0.01). From the perspective of CH4 gas production, the ranking of emission reduction effectiveness for different mitigation strategies is as follows: FRM group > FRH group > FRN group.
format Article
id doaj-art-d739cabfde0543009d4e9117a130a261
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2180
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Microbiology
spelling doaj-art-d739cabfde0543009d4e9117a130a2612025-08-20T03:06:00ZengBMCBMC Microbiology1471-21802025-03-0125111710.1186/s12866-025-03817-8Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaksQian Zhang0Tongqing Guo1Xungang Wang2Lin Wei3Yalin Wang4Shanshan Li5Hongjin Liu6Na Zhao7Shixiao Xu8Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesNorthwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of SciencesAbstract Background Developing region-specific dietary strategies is crucial for mitigating methane (CH4) emissions from yaks. However, there is a lack of tailored emission reduction strategies for yak production in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region. This study utilizes an in vitro rumen fermentation technique (Based on the ANKOMRF gas production measurement system) to investigate the effects of different dietary interventions on CH4 production from regional yaks. The selected strategies—Sodium Nitrate solution, regional Medicago sativa L., and regional Helianthus tuberosus L.—were chosen for their potential to reduce CH4 production through various mechanisms: Sodium Nitrate as a methanogenesis inhibitor, Medicago sativa L. for its high nutritional value and its ability to modulate microbial fermentation, and Helianthus tuberosus L. due to its inulin content, which promotes beneficial microbial activity. These dietary interventions aim not only to reduce CH4 production but also to support rumen health and productivity. In addition, gas chromatography and microbial sequencing techniques were employed to identify the optimal emission reduction strategy for regional yaks and to elucidate the key factors influencing the efficacy of these strategies. Results The results indicate that supplementing the confined feeding ration (FR group) with Sodium Nitrate (12 mmol/L, FRN group), Medicago sativa L. (25%, FRM group), and Helianthus tuberosus L. (3%, FRH group) all have the effect of reducing CH4 production from yak rumen. Among these interventions, the FRM group exhibits the most significant reduction, with a decrease in rumen CH4 production by 42.76% compared to the FR group. The dry matter digestibility, total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), propionate, and butyrate levels in all groups were higher than those in the FR group. However, only the FRM group reached a significant level (P < 0.01). The pH values were significantly lower than those in the FR group (P < 0.01) across all groups. Each group exhibited distinct clustering patterns in bacterial and archaeal communities compared to the FR group (P < 0.05). The α diversity of bacterial communities was significantly lower than that of the FR group (P < 0.01), while the α diversity of archaeal communities was significantly higher than that of the FR group (P < 0.01). Taxa such as Lachnospiraceae, Clostridium, Treponema, Methanomicrobiaceae, Methanosphaera, and Methanoplanus were enriched in the FR group. Conclusions CH4 production from yak rumen were significantly negatively correlated with substrate crude protein (CP) levels, fermentation fluid TVFA levels, α diversity of archaeal communities, and the relative abundance of Selenomonas and Megasphaera in bacterial communities (P < 0.01). Conversely, CH4 production were significantly positively correlated with the relative abundance of Methanoplanus in archaeal communities (P < 0.01). From the perspective of CH4 gas production, the ranking of emission reduction effectiveness for different mitigation strategies is as follows: FRM group > FRH group > FRN group.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03817-8Qinghai-Tibet PlateauRuminantsIn vitro fermentationDietary interventionEmission reduction mechanisms
spellingShingle Qian Zhang
Tongqing Guo
Xungang Wang
Lin Wei
Yalin Wang
Shanshan Li
Hongjin Liu
Na Zhao
Shixiao Xu
Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
BMC Microbiology
Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Ruminants
In vitro fermentation
Dietary intervention
Emission reduction mechanisms
title Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
title_full Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
title_fullStr Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
title_full_unstemmed Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
title_short Response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
title_sort response of rumen methane production and microbial community to different abatement strategies in yaks
topic Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Ruminants
In vitro fermentation
Dietary intervention
Emission reduction mechanisms
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-025-03817-8
work_keys_str_mv AT qianzhang responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT tongqingguo responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT xungangwang responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT linwei responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT yalinwang responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT shanshanli responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT hongjinliu responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT nazhao responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks
AT shixiaoxu responseofrumenmethaneproductionandmicrobialcommunitytodifferentabatementstrategiesinyaks