Assessing the potential of a Bayesian ranking as an alternative to consensus meetings for decision making in research funding: A case study of Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions.
Funding agencies rely on panel or consensus meetings to summarise individual evaluations of grant proposals into a final ranking. However, previous research has shown inconsistency in decisions and inefficiency of consensus meetings. Using data from the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, we aimed at in...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317772 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|