Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion

Motion—and, in particular, local motion or change in location—plays a central role in Kenelm Digby’s natural philosophy and in his arguments for the immateriality of the soul. Despite this, Digby’s account of what motion consists in has yet to receive much scholarly attention. In this paper, I advan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Whiting
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aperio 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of Modern Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmphil.org/article/id/1893/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575940425678848
author Daniel Whiting
author_facet Daniel Whiting
author_sort Daniel Whiting
collection DOAJ
description Motion—and, in particular, local motion or change in location—plays a central role in Kenelm Digby’s natural philosophy and in his arguments for the immateriality of the soul. Despite this, Digby’s account of what motion consists in has yet to receive much scholarly attention. In this paper, I advance a novel interpretation of Digby on motion. According to it, Digby holds that for a body to move is for it to divide from and unify with other bodies. This is a view of motion—as change in relations of parthood—that Alison Peterman attributes to Digby’s contemporary and acquaintance, Margaret Cavendish. Having shown that Digby’s presentation of the view predates Cavendish’s by more than a decade, I make a case that Digby’s work influenced Cavendish’s on this topic. In developing and defending my reading, I consider to what extent the Digbean account of motion and the arguments for it accord with the ideals of the mechanical philosophy emerging in the early modern period.
format Article
id doaj-art-d4c8fd046b9c4a5ab5de7798feef2e86
institution Kabale University
issn 2644-0652
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Aperio
record_format Article
series Journal of Modern Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-d4c8fd046b9c4a5ab5de7798feef2e862025-01-31T16:09:06ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522024-04-016010.25894/jmp.1893Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on MotionDaniel Whiting0University of SouthamptonMotion—and, in particular, local motion or change in location—plays a central role in Kenelm Digby’s natural philosophy and in his arguments for the immateriality of the soul. Despite this, Digby’s account of what motion consists in has yet to receive much scholarly attention. In this paper, I advance a novel interpretation of Digby on motion. According to it, Digby holds that for a body to move is for it to divide from and unify with other bodies. This is a view of motion—as change in relations of parthood—that Alison Peterman attributes to Digby’s contemporary and acquaintance, Margaret Cavendish. Having shown that Digby’s presentation of the view predates Cavendish’s by more than a decade, I make a case that Digby’s work influenced Cavendish’s on this topic. In developing and defending my reading, I consider to what extent the Digbean account of motion and the arguments for it accord with the ideals of the mechanical philosophy emerging in the early modern period.https://jmphil.org/article/id/1893/Margaret CavendishKenelm Digbybodydivisibilitymotionsensible qualities
spellingShingle Daniel Whiting
Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion
Journal of Modern Philosophy
Margaret Cavendish
Kenelm Digby
body
divisibility
motion
sensible qualities
title Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion
title_full Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion
title_fullStr Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion
title_full_unstemmed Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion
title_short Kenelm Digby (and Margaret Cavendish) on Motion
title_sort kenelm digby and margaret cavendish on motion
topic Margaret Cavendish
Kenelm Digby
body
divisibility
motion
sensible qualities
url https://jmphil.org/article/id/1893/
work_keys_str_mv AT danielwhiting kenelmdigbyandmargaretcavendishonmotion