A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images
As computer technologies and image processing software have advanced, it has become progressively easier to produce simple fake or forged images by altering digital images without leaving any discernible trace. There is a significant need to detect manipulated regions in images in crucial fields suc...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IEEE
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | IEEE Access |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11088100/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849245885759750144 |
|---|---|
| author | Mustafa Ozden Canberk Sahin |
| author_facet | Mustafa Ozden Canberk Sahin |
| author_sort | Mustafa Ozden |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As computer technologies and image processing software have advanced, it has become progressively easier to produce simple fake or forged images by altering digital images without leaving any discernible trace. There is a significant need to detect manipulated regions in images in crucial fields such as politics, law, and forensic medicine. In this study, we propose a method that combines the traditional techniques, such as Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), with the advantages of deep learning methods to detect manipulated regions in forged images. The proposed method involves designing an architecture where DWT and DCT are used in parallel with DenseNet based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). To evaluate the effectiveness of this method, we implemented three alternative approaches: one that uses only DCT and CNN, another that uses only DWT and CNN, and a third that employs only CNN without either transformation. In total, four different methods were tested on eight datasets, and their performance was compared using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, dice similarity coefficient, and F1 score. The results from these comparisons clearly indicate the effectiveness and high classification accuracy of the proposed method. By leveraging the combined strengths of traditional image processing techniques and advanced deep learning algorithms, the proposed method demonstrates superior capability in detecting manipulated regions in forged images, thus offering a robust solution for applications in forensic field. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d1795cc1602745f890e773cf668511eb |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2169-3536 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IEEE |
| record_format | Article |
| series | IEEE Access |
| spelling | doaj-art-d1795cc1602745f890e773cf668511eb2025-08-20T03:58:40ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362025-01-011313070113071810.1109/ACCESS.2025.359157111088100A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in ImagesMustafa Ozden0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0362-4017Canberk Sahin1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-4418Electrical and Electronics Engineering Department, Bursa Technical University, Bursa, TürkiyeErmaksan, Bursa, TürkiyeAs computer technologies and image processing software have advanced, it has become progressively easier to produce simple fake or forged images by altering digital images without leaving any discernible trace. There is a significant need to detect manipulated regions in images in crucial fields such as politics, law, and forensic medicine. In this study, we propose a method that combines the traditional techniques, such as Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), with the advantages of deep learning methods to detect manipulated regions in forged images. The proposed method involves designing an architecture where DWT and DCT are used in parallel with DenseNet based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). To evaluate the effectiveness of this method, we implemented three alternative approaches: one that uses only DCT and CNN, another that uses only DWT and CNN, and a third that employs only CNN without either transformation. In total, four different methods were tested on eight datasets, and their performance was compared using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, dice similarity coefficient, and F1 score. The results from these comparisons clearly indicate the effectiveness and high classification accuracy of the proposed method. By leveraging the combined strengths of traditional image processing techniques and advanced deep learning algorithms, the proposed method demonstrates superior capability in detecting manipulated regions in forged images, thus offering a robust solution for applications in forensic field.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11088100/Convolutional neural networks (CNN)discrete cosine transform (DCT)discrete wavelet transform (DWT)image forgery detection |
| spellingShingle | Mustafa Ozden Canberk Sahin A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images IEEE Access Convolutional neural networks (CNN) discrete cosine transform (DCT) discrete wavelet transform (DWT) image forgery detection |
| title | A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images |
| title_full | A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images |
| title_fullStr | A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images |
| title_short | A Comparative Study for Localization of Forgery Regions in Images |
| title_sort | comparative study for localization of forgery regions in images |
| topic | Convolutional neural networks (CNN) discrete cosine transform (DCT) discrete wavelet transform (DWT) image forgery detection |
| url | https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11088100/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mustafaozden acomparativestudyforlocalizationofforgeryregionsinimages AT canberksahin acomparativestudyforlocalizationofforgeryregionsinimages AT mustafaozden comparativestudyforlocalizationofforgeryregionsinimages AT canberksahin comparativestudyforlocalizationofforgeryregionsinimages |