University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course

Abstract University students have begun to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) in many different ways in their undergraduate education, some beneficial to their learning, and some simply expedient to completing assignments with as little work as possible. This exploratory qualitative study examines how...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca W. Black, Bill Tomlinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92937-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849774734332395520
author Rebecca W. Black
Bill Tomlinson
author_facet Rebecca W. Black
Bill Tomlinson
author_sort Rebecca W. Black
collection DOAJ
description Abstract University students have begun to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) in many different ways in their undergraduate education, some beneficial to their learning, and some simply expedient to completing assignments with as little work as possible. This exploratory qualitative study examines how undergraduate students used AI in a large General Education course on sustainability and technology at a research university in the United States in 2023. Thirty-nine students documented their use of AI in their final course project, which involved analyzing conceptual networks connecting core sustainability concepts. Through iterative qualitative coding, we identified key patterns in students’ AI use, including higher-order writing tasks (understanding complex topics, finding evidence), lower-order writing tasks (revising, editing, proofreading), and other learning activities (efficiency enhancement, independent research). Students primarily used AI to improve communication of their original ideas, though some leveraged it for more complex tasks like finding evidence and developing arguments. Many students expressed skepticism about AI-generated content and emphasized maintaining their intellectual independence. While some viewed AI as vital for improving their work, others explicitly distinguished between AI-assisted editing and their original thinking. This analysis provides insight into how students navigate AI use when it is explicitly permitted in coursework, with implications for effectively integrating AI into higher education to support student learning.
format Article
id doaj-art-cd1ce1513dc345e3a01f83d3bd903d7a
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-cd1ce1513dc345e3a01f83d3bd903d7a2025-08-20T03:01:38ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-03-0115111010.1038/s41598-025-92937-2University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education courseRebecca W. Black0Bill Tomlinson1Department of Informatics, University of California, IrvineDepartment of Informatics, University of California, IrvineAbstract University students have begun to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) in many different ways in their undergraduate education, some beneficial to their learning, and some simply expedient to completing assignments with as little work as possible. This exploratory qualitative study examines how undergraduate students used AI in a large General Education course on sustainability and technology at a research university in the United States in 2023. Thirty-nine students documented their use of AI in their final course project, which involved analyzing conceptual networks connecting core sustainability concepts. Through iterative qualitative coding, we identified key patterns in students’ AI use, including higher-order writing tasks (understanding complex topics, finding evidence), lower-order writing tasks (revising, editing, proofreading), and other learning activities (efficiency enhancement, independent research). Students primarily used AI to improve communication of their original ideas, though some leveraged it for more complex tasks like finding evidence and developing arguments. Many students expressed skepticism about AI-generated content and emphasized maintaining their intellectual independence. While some viewed AI as vital for improving their work, others explicitly distinguished between AI-assisted editing and their original thinking. This analysis provides insight into how students navigate AI use when it is explicitly permitted in coursework, with implications for effectively integrating AI into higher education to support student learning.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92937-2Artificial intelligenceChatGPTEducationUndergraduate education
spellingShingle Rebecca W. Black
Bill Tomlinson
University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course
Scientific Reports
Artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
Education
Undergraduate education
title University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course
title_full University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course
title_fullStr University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course
title_full_unstemmed University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course
title_short University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course
title_sort university students describe how they adopt ai for writing and research in a general education course
topic Artificial intelligence
ChatGPT
Education
Undergraduate education
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92937-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccawblack universitystudentsdescribehowtheyadoptaiforwritingandresearchinageneraleducationcourse
AT billtomlinson universitystudentsdescribehowtheyadoptaiforwritingandresearchinageneraleducationcourse