The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain
The purpose of the current work was to study the effect of mini-till, no-till and traditional agricultural technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain. Field trials were carried out in three crop rotation sequences ‘winter rye – spring wheat – barley’ on medium loamy gray forest...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”"
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Зерновое хозяйство России |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.zhros.online/jour/article/view/2818 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849395422271897600 |
|---|---|
| author | A. I. Volkov L. N. Prokhorova D. A. Ivanov |
| author_facet | A. I. Volkov L. N. Prokhorova D. A. Ivanov |
| author_sort | A. I. Volkov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The purpose of the current work was to study the effect of mini-till, no-till and traditional agricultural technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain. Field trials were carried out in three crop rotation sequences ‘winter rye – spring wheat – barley’ on medium loamy gray forest soil of Chuvashia with 2.42 % of humus; 188 mg/kg of mobile phosphorus; 160 mg/kg of exchangeable potassium and 6.2 of exchangeable acidity. During the vegetation period of 2020, the hydrothermal coefficient was 1.04; in 2021 it was 0.60; and in 2022 it was 1.05. The object of the study was an early-maturing variety ‘Elf’. Traditional agricultural technology was based on autumn disk plowing and autumn plowing, early spring harrowing, seedbed cultivation and sowing with subsequent rolling. Mini-till cultivation included autumn disk plowing, spring cultivation and sowing with the multifunctional complex “Cultibar 9000”. No-till cultivation consisted of autumn treatment with the non-selective herbicide “Sprut Extra" and “direct” spring sowing “Cultibar 9000”. The seeding rate was 200 kg/ha. The dose of mineral fertilizers was N30P20К20. The crops were protected from weeds, diseases, and pests. On average, the largest (2.49 t/ha) productivity of malting barley grain was obtained using mini-till technology, and the smallest (2.34 t/ha) when using no-till. The mean productivity with traditional agricultural technology was lower than the maximum by 0.03 t/ha, but larger than the minimum by 0.12 t/ha. The analysis of the qualitative characteristics has shown a reliable effect of agricultural technologies on the brewing properties of barley grain. Thus, traditional technology contributed to obtaining grain of the 1st class, mini-till technology contributed to obtaining grain of the 2nd class, and no-till technology contributed to obtaining grain of the 3rd class of the interstate standard. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c7d66942cbda487386fe2836bf5e42e0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2079-8725 2079-8733 |
| language | Russian |
| publishDate | 2024-11-01 |
| publisher | Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”" |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Зерновое хозяйство России |
| spelling | doaj-art-c7d66942cbda487386fe2836bf5e42e02025-08-20T03:39:37ZrusFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Agricultural Research Center “Donskoy”"Зерновое хозяйство России2079-87252079-87332024-11-011659510010.31367/2079-8725-2024-94-5-95-100986The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grainA. I. Volkov0L. N. Prokhorova1D. A. Ivanov2FSBEI HE Mari State UniversityFSBEI HE Mari State UniversityFSBEI HE Mari State UniversityThe purpose of the current work was to study the effect of mini-till, no-till and traditional agricultural technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain. Field trials were carried out in three crop rotation sequences ‘winter rye – spring wheat – barley’ on medium loamy gray forest soil of Chuvashia with 2.42 % of humus; 188 mg/kg of mobile phosphorus; 160 mg/kg of exchangeable potassium and 6.2 of exchangeable acidity. During the vegetation period of 2020, the hydrothermal coefficient was 1.04; in 2021 it was 0.60; and in 2022 it was 1.05. The object of the study was an early-maturing variety ‘Elf’. Traditional agricultural technology was based on autumn disk plowing and autumn plowing, early spring harrowing, seedbed cultivation and sowing with subsequent rolling. Mini-till cultivation included autumn disk plowing, spring cultivation and sowing with the multifunctional complex “Cultibar 9000”. No-till cultivation consisted of autumn treatment with the non-selective herbicide “Sprut Extra" and “direct” spring sowing “Cultibar 9000”. The seeding rate was 200 kg/ha. The dose of mineral fertilizers was N30P20К20. The crops were protected from weeds, diseases, and pests. On average, the largest (2.49 t/ha) productivity of malting barley grain was obtained using mini-till technology, and the smallest (2.34 t/ha) when using no-till. The mean productivity with traditional agricultural technology was lower than the maximum by 0.03 t/ha, but larger than the minimum by 0.12 t/ha. The analysis of the qualitative characteristics has shown a reliable effect of agricultural technologies on the brewing properties of barley grain. Thus, traditional technology contributed to obtaining grain of the 1st class, mini-till technology contributed to obtaining grain of the 2nd class, and no-till technology contributed to obtaining grain of the 3rd class of the interstate standard.https://www.zhros.online/jour/article/view/2818mini-tillno-tillproductivityqualitygrainmalting barley |
| spellingShingle | A. I. Volkov L. N. Prokhorova D. A. Ivanov The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain Зерновое хозяйство России mini-till no-till productivity quality grain malting barley |
| title | The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain |
| title_full | The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain |
| title_fullStr | The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain |
| title_short | The effect of mini-till and no-till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain |
| title_sort | effect of mini till and no till technologies on productivity and quality of malting barley grain |
| topic | mini-till no-till productivity quality grain malting barley |
| url | https://www.zhros.online/jour/article/view/2818 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aivolkov theeffectofminitillandnotilltechnologiesonproductivityandqualityofmaltingbarleygrain AT lnprokhorova theeffectofminitillandnotilltechnologiesonproductivityandqualityofmaltingbarleygrain AT daivanov theeffectofminitillandnotilltechnologiesonproductivityandqualityofmaltingbarleygrain AT aivolkov effectofminitillandnotilltechnologiesonproductivityandqualityofmaltingbarleygrain AT lnprokhorova effectofminitillandnotilltechnologiesonproductivityandqualityofmaltingbarleygrain AT daivanov effectofminitillandnotilltechnologiesonproductivityandqualityofmaltingbarleygrain |