Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents
After 29 October 1923, when the status of the nation as a republic was declared and its official name was proclaimed to be Türkiye Cumhuriyeti (“the Republic of Turkey”), the officials followed a defensive policy and the Turkish status became part of defensive alliances. In this sense, treaties with...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History , Russian Federation
2024-09-01
|
| Series: | Крымское историческое обозрение |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/KIO_1_2024-_Cojocaru_124-143.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832546485094318080 |
|---|---|
| author | Ionuț Cojocaru |
| author_facet | Ionuț Cojocaru |
| author_sort | Ionuț Cojocaru |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | After 29 October 1923, when the status of the nation as a republic was declared and its official name was proclaimed to be Türkiye Cumhuriyeti (“the Republic of Turkey”), the officials followed a defensive policy and the Turkish status became part of defensive alliances. In this sense, treaties with the USSR were signed, Turkey was part of the Balkan Agreement and had agreements with Great Britain, France, etc. An increased attention was paid to the Balkan space where the legacy of the Ottoman Empire was visible. Ankara’s diplomats appealed to the Turkish-Tatar communities that lived in the geographical area of Balkans to move to the new Turkish state. The Treaty of Lausanne and then the Treaty of Montreux were vital – in the first – for the security of the new Turkish state, but also for the states bordering the Black Sea. From political point of view, the main priority of the foreign turkish policy was to pursue an alliances policy, seeking to maintain and consacrate by treaties its territorial integrity stability in its own influence areas. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bdd47a98d6bd4755939b0b8cf833bf4c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2313-612X 2712-813X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-09-01 |
| publisher | Tatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History , Russian Federation |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Крымское историческое обозрение |
| spelling | doaj-art-bdd47a98d6bd4755939b0b8cf833bf4c2025-02-03T06:50:33ZengTatarstan Academy of Sciences, Marjani Institute of History , Russian FederationКрымское историческое обозрение2313-612X2712-813X2024-09-01111124143http://dx.doi.org/10.22378/kio.2024.1.124-143Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documentsIonuț Cojocaru0University POLITEHNICA of BucharestAfter 29 October 1923, when the status of the nation as a republic was declared and its official name was proclaimed to be Türkiye Cumhuriyeti (“the Republic of Turkey”), the officials followed a defensive policy and the Turkish status became part of defensive alliances. In this sense, treaties with the USSR were signed, Turkey was part of the Balkan Agreement and had agreements with Great Britain, France, etc. An increased attention was paid to the Balkan space where the legacy of the Ottoman Empire was visible. Ankara’s diplomats appealed to the Turkish-Tatar communities that lived in the geographical area of Balkans to move to the new Turkish state. The Treaty of Lausanne and then the Treaty of Montreux were vital – in the first – for the security of the new Turkish state, but also for the states bordering the Black Sea. From political point of view, the main priority of the foreign turkish policy was to pursue an alliances policy, seeking to maintain and consacrate by treaties its territorial integrity stability in its own influence areas.https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/KIO_1_2024-_Cojocaru_124-143.pdfturkeyromanialausanneleague of nationsussrdobrogeatatarsemigration |
| spellingShingle | Ionuț Cojocaru Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents Крымское историческое обозрение turkey romania lausanne league of nations ussr dobrogea tatars emigration |
| title | Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents |
| title_full | Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents |
| title_fullStr | Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents |
| title_full_unstemmed | Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents |
| title_short | Perspectives of Turkish foreign policy based on analysis of Romanian documents |
| title_sort | perspectives of turkish foreign policy based on analysis of romanian documents |
| topic | turkey romania lausanne league of nations ussr dobrogea tatars emigration |
| url | https://crimeanreview.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/KIO_1_2024-_Cojocaru_124-143.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ionutcojocaru perspectivesofturkishforeignpolicybasedonanalysisofromaniandocuments |