Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revolutionized the molecular diagnostics of lung cancer by enabling non-invasive, sensitive identification of actionable mutations. However, ctDNA analysis may be challenging due to tumor shedding variability, leading to false negative results. This study ai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martina Ruglioni, Iacopo Petrini, Stefania Crucitta, Andrea Sbrana, Giovanna Irene Luculli, Leila Sadeghi Gol, Carola Forte, Antonio Chella, Christian Rolfo, Romano Danesi, Marzia Del Re
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Translational Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003541
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591862614982656
author Martina Ruglioni
Iacopo Petrini
Stefania Crucitta
Andrea Sbrana
Giovanna Irene Luculli
Leila Sadeghi Gol
Carola Forte
Antonio Chella
Christian Rolfo
Romano Danesi
Marzia Del Re
author_facet Martina Ruglioni
Iacopo Petrini
Stefania Crucitta
Andrea Sbrana
Giovanna Irene Luculli
Leila Sadeghi Gol
Carola Forte
Antonio Chella
Christian Rolfo
Romano Danesi
Marzia Del Re
author_sort Martina Ruglioni
collection DOAJ
description Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revolutionized the molecular diagnostics of lung cancer by enabling non-invasive, sensitive identification of actionable mutations. However, ctDNA analysis may be challenging due to tumor shedding variability, leading to false negative results. This study aims to understand the determinants for ctDNA shedding based on clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients, for a better interpretation of false negative results to be considered when ordering ctDNA analysis for clinical practice. Methods: Blood samples were collected from patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) NSCLC before treatment and monitored until disease progression. EGFR was assessed on tissue by standard procedures, while EGFR status on ctDNA was tested using dPCR at baseline and at the first reassessment. NGS was used to evaluate patients mutational status at the progression of the disease. Results: A total of 40 mEGFR tissue samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for mEGFR before starting the first line, 65 % of patients had detectable mEGFR in ctDNA (“shedders”). Higher ECOG PS (p = 0.04), bilateral localization of primary tumor (p = 0.04), and the presence of intrathoracic/extrathoracic disease (p = 0.05), were associated to mEGFR shedding. Shedders had shorter PFS compared to non-shedders (p = 0.03). Patients with detectable mEGFR in ctDNA at the first radiological assessment exhibited worse PFS compared to patients with ctDNA clearance (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our preliminary data demonstrate that specific clinical characteristics predict mEGFR shedding in ctDNA of NSCLC, suggesting a potential clinical applicability for understanding potential false negative results and appropriate reporting in clinical practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-a8f32e6bba2d4b7f91781e22bc7ed6f3
institution Kabale University
issn 1936-5233
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Translational Oncology
spelling doaj-art-a8f32e6bba2d4b7f91781e22bc7ed6f32025-01-22T05:41:23ZengElsevierTranslational Oncology1936-52332025-02-0152102228Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patientsMartina Ruglioni0Iacopo Petrini1Stefania Crucitta2Andrea Sbrana3Giovanna Irene Luculli4Leila Sadeghi Gol5Carola Forte6Antonio Chella7Christian Rolfo8Romano Danesi9Marzia Del Re10Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, ItalyUnit of Pneumology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, ItalyUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, ItalyUnit of Pneumology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, ItalyUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, ItalyUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, ItalyUnit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, ItalyUnit of Pneumology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Arthur G. James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USADepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Italy; Corresponding author.Saint Camillus International University of Medical and Health Sciences, Rome, Italy; Direzione Scientifica Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, ItalyBackground: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) revolutionized the molecular diagnostics of lung cancer by enabling non-invasive, sensitive identification of actionable mutations. However, ctDNA analysis may be challenging due to tumor shedding variability, leading to false negative results. This study aims to understand the determinants for ctDNA shedding based on clinical characteristics of lung cancer patients, for a better interpretation of false negative results to be considered when ordering ctDNA analysis for clinical practice. Methods: Blood samples were collected from patients with stage IV EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) NSCLC before treatment and monitored until disease progression. EGFR was assessed on tissue by standard procedures, while EGFR status on ctDNA was tested using dPCR at baseline and at the first reassessment. NGS was used to evaluate patients mutational status at the progression of the disease. Results: A total of 40 mEGFR tissue samples were collected. Plasma samples were analyzed for mEGFR before starting the first line, 65 % of patients had detectable mEGFR in ctDNA (“shedders”). Higher ECOG PS (p = 0.04), bilateral localization of primary tumor (p = 0.04), and the presence of intrathoracic/extrathoracic disease (p = 0.05), were associated to mEGFR shedding. Shedders had shorter PFS compared to non-shedders (p = 0.03). Patients with detectable mEGFR in ctDNA at the first radiological assessment exhibited worse PFS compared to patients with ctDNA clearance (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our preliminary data demonstrate that specific clinical characteristics predict mEGFR shedding in ctDNA of NSCLC, suggesting a potential clinical applicability for understanding potential false negative results and appropriate reporting in clinical practice.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003541Circulating-tumor DNANSCLCTumor sheddingPredictive biomarkersmEGFR
spellingShingle Martina Ruglioni
Iacopo Petrini
Stefania Crucitta
Andrea Sbrana
Giovanna Irene Luculli
Leila Sadeghi Gol
Carola Forte
Antonio Chella
Christian Rolfo
Romano Danesi
Marzia Del Re
Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
Translational Oncology
Circulating-tumor DNA
NSCLC
Tumor shedding
Predictive biomarkers
mEGFR
title Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
title_full Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
title_fullStr Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
title_short Clinical characteristics of EGFR-ctDNA shedders in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients
title_sort clinical characteristics of egfr ctdna shedders in egfr mutant nsclc patients
topic Circulating-tumor DNA
NSCLC
Tumor shedding
Predictive biomarkers
mEGFR
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936523324003541
work_keys_str_mv AT martinaruglioni clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT iacopopetrini clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT stefaniacrucitta clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT andreasbrana clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT giovannaireneluculli clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT leilasadeghigol clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT carolaforte clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT antoniochella clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT christianrolfo clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT romanodanesi clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients
AT marziadelre clinicalcharacteristicsofegfrctdnasheddersinegfrmutantnsclcpatients