Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement

To deliver high-quality courses across various instructional environments, instructors must consider variations in learner engagement. However, limited attention has been paid to whether online and in-person teaching approaches differ in terms of their effects on learner engagement in language learn...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhiyong Li, Zonglin Dai, Jiaying Li, Pengju Guan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:Acta Psychologica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182500085X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832573234836406272
author Zhiyong Li
Zonglin Dai
Jiaying Li
Pengju Guan
author_facet Zhiyong Li
Zonglin Dai
Jiaying Li
Pengju Guan
author_sort Zhiyong Li
collection DOAJ
description To deliver high-quality courses across various instructional environments, instructors must consider variations in learner engagement. However, limited attention has been paid to whether online and in-person teaching approaches differ in terms of their effects on learner engagement in language learning environments. To fill this void, we aim to investigate the differences in overall and three specific types of engagement between online and in-person classrooms. The study is based on 168 learners in China who attended online and in-person English as a foreign language (EFL) course, respectively, across two semesters. This research utilized the mixed methods approach, involving the quantitative and qualitive strands. Firstly, t-tests revealed that, although participants positively rated their engagement in online and in-person courses, they evaluated online instruction less favorable in terms of overall engagement, emotional engagement, and cognitive engagement compared to in-person instruction. They also reported similar levels of behavioral engagement. Secondly, an open survey and interviews revealed these differences were primarily caused by the limited interaction, learners' insufficient digital skills, their lack of self-regulation, and instructors' inadequate technological pedagogical content knowledge online, while the flexibility of online learning likely compromised the behavioral engagement difference. We discussed the findings in light of self-determination theory (SDT), drawing pedagogical implications for language teaching and policymaking for delivery of engaging offline, online, and hybrid language programs in the future.
format Article
id doaj-art-a2f57d41a6ec45beb65c69bbec497a59
institution Kabale University
issn 0001-6918
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Acta Psychologica
spelling doaj-art-a2f57d41a6ec45beb65c69bbec497a592025-02-02T05:26:36ZengElsevierActa Psychologica0001-69182025-03-01253104772Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagementZhiyong Li0Zonglin Dai1Jiaying Li2Pengju Guan3School of Foreign Languages, Tianjin University of Commerce, 409 The Glorious Road, Beichen District, Tianjin, ChinaTianjin Chengjian University, 26, Jinjing Road, Xiqing District, Tianjin, China; Corresponding author.University Libraries, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Rd, Haihe Educational Area, Jinnan District, Tianjin, ChinaHenan University, 379, Mingli Rd North, Zhengdong New Area, Zhengzhou, ChinaTo deliver high-quality courses across various instructional environments, instructors must consider variations in learner engagement. However, limited attention has been paid to whether online and in-person teaching approaches differ in terms of their effects on learner engagement in language learning environments. To fill this void, we aim to investigate the differences in overall and three specific types of engagement between online and in-person classrooms. The study is based on 168 learners in China who attended online and in-person English as a foreign language (EFL) course, respectively, across two semesters. This research utilized the mixed methods approach, involving the quantitative and qualitive strands. Firstly, t-tests revealed that, although participants positively rated their engagement in online and in-person courses, they evaluated online instruction less favorable in terms of overall engagement, emotional engagement, and cognitive engagement compared to in-person instruction. They also reported similar levels of behavioral engagement. Secondly, an open survey and interviews revealed these differences were primarily caused by the limited interaction, learners' insufficient digital skills, their lack of self-regulation, and instructors' inadequate technological pedagogical content knowledge online, while the flexibility of online learning likely compromised the behavioral engagement difference. We discussed the findings in light of self-determination theory (SDT), drawing pedagogical implications for language teaching and policymaking for delivery of engaging offline, online, and hybrid language programs in the future.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182500085XLearner engagementIn-person instructionOnline instructionEFL coursesSDT
spellingShingle Zhiyong Li
Zonglin Dai
Jiaying Li
Pengju Guan
Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement
Acta Psychologica
Learner engagement
In-person instruction
Online instruction
EFL courses
SDT
title Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement
title_full Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement
title_fullStr Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement
title_full_unstemmed Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement
title_short Does the instructional approach really matter? A comparative study of the impact of online and in-person instruction on learner engagement
title_sort does the instructional approach really matter a comparative study of the impact of online and in person instruction on learner engagement
topic Learner engagement
In-person instruction
Online instruction
EFL courses
SDT
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000169182500085X
work_keys_str_mv AT zhiyongli doestheinstructionalapproachreallymatteracomparativestudyoftheimpactofonlineandinpersoninstructiononlearnerengagement
AT zonglindai doestheinstructionalapproachreallymatteracomparativestudyoftheimpactofonlineandinpersoninstructiononlearnerengagement
AT jiayingli doestheinstructionalapproachreallymatteracomparativestudyoftheimpactofonlineandinpersoninstructiononlearnerengagement
AT pengjuguan doestheinstructionalapproachreallymatteracomparativestudyoftheimpactofonlineandinpersoninstructiononlearnerengagement