A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods
Inthis study, the equated score results of the kernel equating (KE) methodcompared with the results of traditional equating methods—equipercentile andlinear equating and 9th grade 2009 ÖBBS Form B of Social Sciences and 2009 ÖBBSForm D of Social Sciences was used under an equivalent groups (EG) desi...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
izzet kara
2018-09-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/484702 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850024888247517184 |
|---|---|
| author | Selahattin Gelbal Çiğdem Akın Arıkan |
| author_facet | Selahattin Gelbal Çiğdem Akın Arıkan |
| author_sort | Selahattin Gelbal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Inthis study, the equated score results of the kernel equating (KE) methodcompared with the results of traditional equating methods—equipercentile andlinear equating and 9th grade 2009 ÖBBS Form B of Social Sciences and 2009 ÖBBSForm D of Social Sciences was used under an equivalent groups (EG) design.Study sample consists of 16.249 students taking booklets B and another 16.327students taking D in that test. The analysis of the test forms was carried outin four steps. First, descriptive statistics were calculated for the data andthen it was checked whether the data obtained from the two booklets satisfy theequating conditions. In the second step, the booklets were equated according tomethods. Lastly, the errors for each equating methods were calculated. Kernelequating results were nearly same to the results from the correspondingtraditional equating methods. In Kernel equating, when parameter h was selectedas optimal, equated scores provided almost identical results as traditionalequipercentile equating. When it was selected large, this time the equatedscores provided results almost identical to traditional linear equating. It isconcluded that Kernel equating methods are relatively more the most appropriateequating method method than traditional equating methods. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a09d6e1ecbaf46d5b75836572f76ec42 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2148-7456 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
| publisher | izzet kara |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-a09d6e1ecbaf46d5b75836572f76ec422025-08-20T03:00:59Zengizzet karaInternational Journal of Assessment Tools in Education2148-74562018-09-015341742710.21449/ijate.409826618A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating MethodsSelahattin Gelbal0Çiğdem Akın Arıkan1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5255-8792HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİInthis study, the equated score results of the kernel equating (KE) methodcompared with the results of traditional equating methods—equipercentile andlinear equating and 9th grade 2009 ÖBBS Form B of Social Sciences and 2009 ÖBBSForm D of Social Sciences was used under an equivalent groups (EG) design.Study sample consists of 16.249 students taking booklets B and another 16.327students taking D in that test. The analysis of the test forms was carried outin four steps. First, descriptive statistics were calculated for the data andthen it was checked whether the data obtained from the two booklets satisfy theequating conditions. In the second step, the booklets were equated according tomethods. Lastly, the errors for each equating methods were calculated. Kernelequating results were nearly same to the results from the correspondingtraditional equating methods. In Kernel equating, when parameter h was selectedas optimal, equated scores provided almost identical results as traditionalequipercentile equating. When it was selected large, this time the equatedscores provided results almost identical to traditional linear equating. It isconcluded that Kernel equating methods are relatively more the most appropriateequating method method than traditional equating methods.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/484702kernel equatingtraditional equating methodsthe equivalent groups designkernel equatingtraditional equating methodsthe equivalent groups design |
| spellingShingle | Selahattin Gelbal Çiğdem Akın Arıkan A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education kernel equating traditional equating methods the equivalent groups design kernel equating traditional equating methods the equivalent groups design |
| title | A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods |
| title_full | A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods |
| title_fullStr | A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods |
| title_short | A Comparison of Traditional and Kernel Equating Methods |
| title_sort | comparison of traditional and kernel equating methods |
| topic | kernel equating traditional equating methods the equivalent groups design kernel equating traditional equating methods the equivalent groups design |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/484702 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT selahattingelbal acomparisonoftraditionalandkernelequatingmethods AT cigdemakınarıkan acomparisonoftraditionalandkernelequatingmethods AT selahattingelbal comparisonoftraditionalandkernelequatingmethods AT cigdemakınarıkan comparisonoftraditionalandkernelequatingmethods |