Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice
Abstract Background Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely used evaluation method for health profession students. In Chile, physicians OSCEs have incorporated clinical reasoning and patient-centered communication assessment since 2015. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pan...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medical Education |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07210-x |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849709670624657408 |
|---|---|
| author | Armijo-Rivera Soledad Zamorano Saavedra Catalina Vicencio-Clarke Scarlett Behrens Pérez Claudia Pérez-Villalobos Cristhian |
| author_facet | Armijo-Rivera Soledad Zamorano Saavedra Catalina Vicencio-Clarke Scarlett Behrens Pérez Claudia Pérez-Villalobos Cristhian |
| author_sort | Armijo-Rivera Soledad |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely used evaluation method for health profession students. In Chile, physicians OSCEs have incorporated clinical reasoning and patient-centered communication assessment since 2015. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate medical clinical practice remains unknown, in particular whether this context disproportionately affected lower-income regions, as was the case analysed in this study. Aim This research compares the OSCE patient-centered communication and clinical reasoning results among five cohorts of intermediate-level medical students with restricted clinical practice in Chile. Methods We designed an observational study analyzing five cohorts of fourth-year medical students with different clinical practice opportunities, with 3rd to 4th-year progression analysis in two cohorts. Adaptations to compensate lack of clinical practice hours include high-fidelity simulation and theoretical discussion of clinical cases, as well as formative OSCE at third-year level in two cohorts. Communication in OSCE was assessed using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) and Clinical Reasoning (CR) with a register form (that includes a global score, History Taking, Differential Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Plan subscores). Descriptive statistics and central tendency measurements were applied to analyze CAT and CR scores, along with Kruskal-Wallis tests and Wilcoxon’s test for paired sample analysis. Findings The 2018 cohort shows the lowest results in both variables although it was the cohort with more clinical practice opportunities. The higher CAT result was in the 2021 cohort, while the 2022 cohort exhibited a significantly higher CR score (p < 0.05). There is a linear tendency to grow over the years for both measures. The 2023 cohort shows significant improvement between third-year and fourth-year OSCEs in all items of CAT and a detriment in CR, while the 2022 cohort shows a significant increment in CR and four items of CAT (p < 0.05). Conclusion The students with fewer hours of clinical practice showed similar CR and communication results to the prepandemic group, probably because of the adaptations implemented. Simulation was an effective alternative practice in a restricted clinical practice context. Component-by-component analysis and trends of change are a better approach to assessing progression than global scores. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9cfdf5a52e3041efa60aac9227ff5a13 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1472-6920 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medical Education |
| spelling | doaj-art-9cfdf5a52e3041efa60aac9227ff5a132025-08-20T03:15:12ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202025-04-0125111010.1186/s12909-025-07210-xUsing the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practiceArmijo-Rivera Soledad0Zamorano Saavedra Catalina1Vicencio-Clarke Scarlett2Behrens Pérez Claudia3Pérez-Villalobos Cristhian4Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del DesarrolloEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Católica del NorteUnidad de Simulación e Innovación en Salud, Universidad San SebastiánDirección General de Pregrado, Universidad Católica del NorteDepartamento de Educación Médica, Universidad de ConcepciónAbstract Background Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a widely used evaluation method for health profession students. In Chile, physicians OSCEs have incorporated clinical reasoning and patient-centered communication assessment since 2015. The overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on undergraduate medical clinical practice remains unknown, in particular whether this context disproportionately affected lower-income regions, as was the case analysed in this study. Aim This research compares the OSCE patient-centered communication and clinical reasoning results among five cohorts of intermediate-level medical students with restricted clinical practice in Chile. Methods We designed an observational study analyzing five cohorts of fourth-year medical students with different clinical practice opportunities, with 3rd to 4th-year progression analysis in two cohorts. Adaptations to compensate lack of clinical practice hours include high-fidelity simulation and theoretical discussion of clinical cases, as well as formative OSCE at third-year level in two cohorts. Communication in OSCE was assessed using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) and Clinical Reasoning (CR) with a register form (that includes a global score, History Taking, Differential Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Plan subscores). Descriptive statistics and central tendency measurements were applied to analyze CAT and CR scores, along with Kruskal-Wallis tests and Wilcoxon’s test for paired sample analysis. Findings The 2018 cohort shows the lowest results in both variables although it was the cohort with more clinical practice opportunities. The higher CAT result was in the 2021 cohort, while the 2022 cohort exhibited a significantly higher CR score (p < 0.05). There is a linear tendency to grow over the years for both measures. The 2023 cohort shows significant improvement between third-year and fourth-year OSCEs in all items of CAT and a detriment in CR, while the 2022 cohort shows a significant increment in CR and four items of CAT (p < 0.05). Conclusion The students with fewer hours of clinical practice showed similar CR and communication results to the prepandemic group, probably because of the adaptations implemented. Simulation was an effective alternative practice in a restricted clinical practice context. Component-by-component analysis and trends of change are a better approach to assessing progression than global scores.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07210-xCommunicationPatient-centered communicationClinical reasoningOSCEMedical students |
| spellingShingle | Armijo-Rivera Soledad Zamorano Saavedra Catalina Vicencio-Clarke Scarlett Behrens Pérez Claudia Pérez-Villalobos Cristhian Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice BMC Medical Education Communication Patient-centered communication Clinical reasoning OSCE Medical students |
| title | Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice |
| title_full | Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice |
| title_fullStr | Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice |
| title_short | Using the OSCE to assess medical students’ communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice |
| title_sort | using the osce to assess medical students communication and clinical reasoning during five years of restricted clinical practice |
| topic | Communication Patient-centered communication Clinical reasoning OSCE Medical students |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07210-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT armijoriverasoledad usingtheoscetoassessmedicalstudentscommunicationandclinicalreasoningduringfiveyearsofrestrictedclinicalpractice AT zamoranosaavedracatalina usingtheoscetoassessmedicalstudentscommunicationandclinicalreasoningduringfiveyearsofrestrictedclinicalpractice AT vicencioclarkescarlett usingtheoscetoassessmedicalstudentscommunicationandclinicalreasoningduringfiveyearsofrestrictedclinicalpractice AT behrensperezclaudia usingtheoscetoassessmedicalstudentscommunicationandclinicalreasoningduringfiveyearsofrestrictedclinicalpractice AT perezvillaloboscristhian usingtheoscetoassessmedicalstudentscommunicationandclinicalreasoningduringfiveyearsofrestrictedclinicalpractice |