“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents

A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guilherme Gonçalves Alcântara, Florestan Prado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal 2017-03-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/25
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849250954493296640
author Guilherme Gonçalves Alcântara
Florestan Prado
author_facet Guilherme Gonçalves Alcântara
Florestan Prado
author_sort Guilherme Gonçalves Alcântara
collection DOAJ
description A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punishment. We used the phenomenological method to bring to São Paulo judicial practice a hermeneutic constraint directed to judicial solipsism.
format Article
id doaj-art-941623ed003540f8b18aa66ca64ed650
institution Kabale University
issn 2525-510X
language English
publishDate 2017-03-01
publisher Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
spelling doaj-art-941623ed003540f8b18aa66ca64ed6502025-08-20T03:57:08ZengInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual PenalRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal2525-510X2017-03-013134336410.22197/rbdpp.v3i1.2526“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedentsGuilherme Gonçalves Alcântara0Florestan Prado1Centro Universitário Toledo/Presidente PrudenteCentro Universitário Toledo/Presidente PrudenteA semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punishment. We used the phenomenological method to bring to São Paulo judicial practice a hermeneutic constraint directed to judicial solipsism.http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/25Senso comum teórico dos juristashermenêutica constitucionalgarantismopunitivismoprecedentes.
spellingShingle Guilherme Gonçalves Alcântara
Florestan Prado
“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents
Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Senso comum teórico dos juristas
hermenêutica constitucional
garantismo
punitivismo
precedentes.
title “'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents
title_full “'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents
title_fullStr “'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents
title_full_unstemmed “'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents
title_short “'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents
title_sort the constitution means what the supreme court says it means but only when i want about how not to work with precedents
topic Senso comum teórico dos juristas
hermenêutica constitucional
garantismo
punitivismo
precedentes.
url http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/25
work_keys_str_mv AT guilhermegoncalvesalcantara theconstitutionmeanswhatthesupremecourtsaysitmeansbutonlywheniwantabouthownottoworkwithprecedents
AT florestanprado theconstitutionmeanswhatthesupremecourtsaysitmeansbutonlywheniwantabouthownottoworkwithprecedents