“'The Constitution means what the Supreme Court says it means’... But only when I want!” About how (not to) work with precedents

A semiotic analysis of the arguments brought to light by the 9th Criminal Chamber of São Paulo’s Court of Appeal when compared to the paradigmatic judgments of the Supreme Court in criminal proceedings harvest, dealing specifically with the presumption of innocence and the individualization of punis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guilherme Gonçalves Alcântara, Florestan Prado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal 2017-03-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/index.php/RBDPP/article/view/25
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!