Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting

The coming together of frames and spaces poses a particular challenge at the dawn of early modern painting. In the master narrative of the period the emphasis is customarily put on the emergence of three-dimensional space. Initially painters aimed at generating homogenous depth within their work, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Péter Bokody
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte" 2023-11-01
Series:Sillages Critiques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/14888
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578552688541696
author Péter Bokody
author_facet Péter Bokody
author_sort Péter Bokody
collection DOAJ
description The coming together of frames and spaces poses a particular challenge at the dawn of early modern painting. In the master narrative of the period the emphasis is customarily put on the emergence of three-dimensional space. Initially painters aimed at generating homogenous depth within their work, a prerequisite of coherent immersive experience. However, hybridization of perspectivic registers was also explored. The importance of frames cannot be overlooked in this context. They either separate the various incompatible space-segments within the work, or by the virtue of their own fictiveness, they introduce the heterogenous element itself. In this essay, I explore some works that complicate further this dynamic link between frame and space. I will first turn to an example where the frame does not regulate the insertion of an independent register: the Ambassadors by Hans Holbein the Younger. In order to contextualize the radicality of this solution, I will examine a series works by Pietro Lorenzetti, Fra Angelico, Benozzo Gozzoli, Neri di Bicci, Sandro Botticelli and Fra Bartolommeo, in which embedded votive images are placed on or around the frame of the work. They are not mere objects; they carry elements of an independent virtual space which are at odds both with the frame and the principal perspective of the painting. They explore the same motif, that of a little panel for private devotion depicting the Golgotha, superimposed upon a larger painting. The distorted skull and the crucifix on Holbein’s painting map to this iconography and offer its personalized rereading.
format Article
id doaj-art-8f3eaa538fcc481094f9253b64ed333d
institution Kabale University
issn 1272-3819
1969-6302
language English
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"
record_format Article
series Sillages Critiques
spelling doaj-art-8f3eaa538fcc481094f9253b64ed333d2025-01-30T13:47:17ZengCentre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"Sillages Critiques1272-38191969-63022023-11-013510.4000/sillagescritiques.14888Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance PaintingPéter BokodyThe coming together of frames and spaces poses a particular challenge at the dawn of early modern painting. In the master narrative of the period the emphasis is customarily put on the emergence of three-dimensional space. Initially painters aimed at generating homogenous depth within their work, a prerequisite of coherent immersive experience. However, hybridization of perspectivic registers was also explored. The importance of frames cannot be overlooked in this context. They either separate the various incompatible space-segments within the work, or by the virtue of their own fictiveness, they introduce the heterogenous element itself. In this essay, I explore some works that complicate further this dynamic link between frame and space. I will first turn to an example where the frame does not regulate the insertion of an independent register: the Ambassadors by Hans Holbein the Younger. In order to contextualize the radicality of this solution, I will examine a series works by Pietro Lorenzetti, Fra Angelico, Benozzo Gozzoli, Neri di Bicci, Sandro Botticelli and Fra Bartolommeo, in which embedded votive images are placed on or around the frame of the work. They are not mere objects; they carry elements of an independent virtual space which are at odds both with the frame and the principal perspective of the painting. They explore the same motif, that of a little panel for private devotion depicting the Golgotha, superimposed upon a larger painting. The distorted skull and the crucifix on Holbein’s painting map to this iconography and offer its personalized rereading.https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/14888perspectivemise-en-abymeGolgothaHolbein (Hans)Lorenzetti (Pietro)Angelico (Fra)
spellingShingle Péter Bokody
Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting
Sillages Critiques
perspective
mise-en-abyme
Golgotha
Holbein (Hans)
Lorenzetti (Pietro)
Angelico (Fra)
title Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting
title_full Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting
title_fullStr Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting
title_full_unstemmed Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting
title_short Framing the Golgotha in Renaissance Painting
title_sort framing the golgotha in renaissance painting
topic perspective
mise-en-abyme
Golgotha
Holbein (Hans)
Lorenzetti (Pietro)
Angelico (Fra)
url https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/14888
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbokody framingthegolgothainrenaissancepainting