Physicalism and moral responsibility: presentation of derivative consequence argument
In this paper, the author introduces the derivative consequence argument, which aims to demonstrate that moral responsibility is impossible in the world where physicalism and the strong realism about the laws of nature are both true. The basic intuition of the argument is that if the laws of natu...
Saved in:
Main Author: | B. V. Faul |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Omsk State Technical University, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Омский научный вестник: Серия "Общество. История. Современность" |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.omgtu.ru/general_information/media_omgtu/journal_of_omsk_research_journal/files/arhiv/2020/%D0%A2.%205,%20%E2%84%96%204%20(%D0%9E%D0%98%D0%A1)/57-60%20%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%91.%20%D0%92..pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
New version of derivative consequence argument and response to objections
by: B. V. Faul
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Conditional analysis of free will and consequence argument
by: M. A. Sekatskaya
Published: (2020-12-01) -
On derivative consequence argument
by: D. N. Razeev
Published: (2020-12-01) -
To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable?
by: T. S. Demin
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Yapay Eğilimler ve Eğilimsel Bağdaşırcılık Üzerine Bir Deneme
by: Atilla Akalın
Published: (2024-07-01)