Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production

Maize and dry bean are the most important food crops that feed over 85% of Kenyan households. However, the productivity of these crops is low due to the high costs of land preparation and weed control, soil infertility and limited soil moisture under the current conventional tillage system of produc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hillary Moses Omondi Otieno, George N. Chemining’wa, Charles K. Gachene, Shamie Zingore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hasan Eleroğlu 2019-10-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/2566
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849736481669644288
author Hillary Moses Omondi Otieno
George N. Chemining’wa
Charles K. Gachene
Shamie Zingore
author_facet Hillary Moses Omondi Otieno
George N. Chemining’wa
Charles K. Gachene
Shamie Zingore
author_sort Hillary Moses Omondi Otieno
collection DOAJ
description Maize and dry bean are the most important food crops that feed over 85% of Kenyan households. However, the productivity of these crops is low due to the high costs of land preparation and weed control, soil infertility and limited soil moisture under the current conventional tillage system of production. A study was carried in Embu County and Kirinyaga County to determine the economic returns of a maize-bean rotation system under different tillage systems and fertilizer regimes. Maize was produced during the long rains under no-till with crop residue retention (NT+CR) and conventional tillage with no crop residue retention (CT-CR) and inorganic fertilizer regimes (NK, NP, PK, NPK, and NPK+CaMgZnBS). Dry bean was planted in the short rains in the same plots where maize under different nutrient management regimes and tillage systems had been grown and harvested. The trial was laid out in a split-plot design with the tillage method as the main plot and fertilizer as sub-plot. Economic performance was assessed using partial budget analysis based on labor data and prices of all inputs used during the production period. Grain yields were reduced by 10% to reflect farmers’ yield levels. Maize and dry bean grains were sold at the prevailing farm gate prices. Results showed that maize-bean rotation was KE 22,718 cheaper under no-till with crop residue retention (NT+CR) than under conventional tillage with no crop residue retention (CT-CR). On average, NT+CR recorded KE 29,569 higher net benefit than CT-CR. The NT+CR tillage recorded a benefit to cost ratio of 3.7 compared to 2.7 recorded under CT-CR tillage system. The NT+CR with NK combined was the most profitable treatment with a benefit to cost ratio of 4.92 for maize and 4.33 for maize-bean rotation system. Based on this research, combination of no-till with crop residue retention has the potential to improve economic status and alleviate poverty among resource-constrained farmers.
format Article
id doaj-art-898bf8f7995f48abb2a58eb48000f95a
institution DOAJ
issn 2148-127X
language English
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Hasan Eleroğlu
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
spelling doaj-art-898bf8f7995f48abb2a58eb48000f95a2025-08-20T03:07:16ZengHasan EleroğluTurkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology2148-127X2019-10-017101548155310.24925/turjaf.v7i10.1548-1553.25661266Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable ProductionHillary Moses Omondi Otieno0George N. Chemining’wa1Charles K. Gachene2Shamie Zingore3Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, NairobiDepartment of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Nairobi,Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, University of Nairobi, NairobiInternational Plant Nutrition Institute, Sub-Saharan Africa Program, Nairobi,Maize and dry bean are the most important food crops that feed over 85% of Kenyan households. However, the productivity of these crops is low due to the high costs of land preparation and weed control, soil infertility and limited soil moisture under the current conventional tillage system of production. A study was carried in Embu County and Kirinyaga County to determine the economic returns of a maize-bean rotation system under different tillage systems and fertilizer regimes. Maize was produced during the long rains under no-till with crop residue retention (NT+CR) and conventional tillage with no crop residue retention (CT-CR) and inorganic fertilizer regimes (NK, NP, PK, NPK, and NPK+CaMgZnBS). Dry bean was planted in the short rains in the same plots where maize under different nutrient management regimes and tillage systems had been grown and harvested. The trial was laid out in a split-plot design with the tillage method as the main plot and fertilizer as sub-plot. Economic performance was assessed using partial budget analysis based on labor data and prices of all inputs used during the production period. Grain yields were reduced by 10% to reflect farmers’ yield levels. Maize and dry bean grains were sold at the prevailing farm gate prices. Results showed that maize-bean rotation was KE 22,718 cheaper under no-till with crop residue retention (NT+CR) than under conventional tillage with no crop residue retention (CT-CR). On average, NT+CR recorded KE 29,569 higher net benefit than CT-CR. The NT+CR tillage recorded a benefit to cost ratio of 3.7 compared to 2.7 recorded under CT-CR tillage system. The NT+CR with NK combined was the most profitable treatment with a benefit to cost ratio of 4.92 for maize and 4.33 for maize-bean rotation system. Based on this research, combination of no-till with crop residue retention has the potential to improve economic status and alleviate poverty among resource-constrained farmers.http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/2566conservation agriculturecrop rotation systemdry bean productionfertilizer applicationmaize production
spellingShingle Hillary Moses Omondi Otieno
George N. Chemining’wa
Charles K. Gachene
Shamie Zingore
Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
Turkish Journal of Agriculture: Food Science and Technology
conservation agriculture
crop rotation system
dry bean production
fertilizer application
maize production
title Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
title_full Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
title_fullStr Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
title_full_unstemmed Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
title_short Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
title_sort economics of maize and bean production why farmers need to shift to conservation agriculture for sustainable production
topic conservation agriculture
crop rotation system
dry bean production
fertilizer application
maize production
url http://www.agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/2566
work_keys_str_mv AT hillarymosesomondiotieno economicsofmaizeandbeanproductionwhyfarmersneedtoshifttoconservationagricultureforsustainableproduction
AT georgencheminingwa economicsofmaizeandbeanproductionwhyfarmersneedtoshifttoconservationagricultureforsustainableproduction
AT charleskgachene economicsofmaizeandbeanproductionwhyfarmersneedtoshifttoconservationagricultureforsustainableproduction
AT shamiezingore economicsofmaizeandbeanproductionwhyfarmersneedtoshifttoconservationagricultureforsustainableproduction