Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies

Molecular imaging with ultrasound relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) selectively adhering to a ligand-specific target. Prior studies have shown that only small quantities of microbubbles are retained at their target sites, therefore, enhancing contrast sensitivity to low concentrations of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason E. Streeter, Ryan Gessner, Iman Miles, Paul A. Dayton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2010-03-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2010.00005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563153744265216
author Jason E. Streeter
Ryan Gessner
Iman Miles
Paul A. Dayton
author_facet Jason E. Streeter
Ryan Gessner
Iman Miles
Paul A. Dayton
author_sort Jason E. Streeter
collection DOAJ
description Molecular imaging with ultrasound relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) selectively adhering to a ligand-specific target. Prior studies have shown that only small quantities of microbubbles are retained at their target sites, therefore, enhancing contrast sensitivity to low concentrations of microbubbles is essential to improve molecular imaging techniques. In order to assess the effect of MCA diameter on imaging sensitivity, perfusion and molecular imaging studies were performed with microbubbles of varying size distributions. To assess signal improvement and MCA circulation time as a function of size and concentration, blood perfusion was imaged in rat kidneys using nontargeted size-sorted MCAs with a Siemens Sequoia ultrasound system (Siemans, Mountain View, CA) in cadence pulse sequencing (CPS) mode. Molecular imaging sensitivity improvements were studied with size-sorted α v ß 3 -targeted bubbles in both fibrosarcoma and R3230 rat tumor models. In perfusion imaging studies, video intensity and contrast persistence was ≈8 times and ≈3 times greater respectively, for “sorted 3-micron” MCAs (diameter, 3.3 ± 1.95 μm) when compared to “unsorted” MCAs (diameter, 0.9 ± 0.45 μm) at low concentrations. In targeted experiments, application of sorted 3-micron MCAs resulted in a ≈20 times video intensity increase over unsorted populations. Tailoring size-distributions results in substantial imaging sensitivity improvement over unsorted populations, which is essential in maximizing sensitivity to small numbers of MCAs for molecular imaging.
format Article
id doaj-art-818f7a6e3f44438182f6aa6791fe320f
institution Kabale University
issn 1536-0121
language English
publishDate 2010-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj-art-818f7a6e3f44438182f6aa6791fe320f2025-01-03T00:11:14ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212010-03-01910.2310/7290.2010.0000510.2310_7290.2010.00005Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo StudiesJason E. StreeterRyan GessnerIman MilesPaul A. DaytonMolecular imaging with ultrasound relies on microbubble contrast agents (MCAs) selectively adhering to a ligand-specific target. Prior studies have shown that only small quantities of microbubbles are retained at their target sites, therefore, enhancing contrast sensitivity to low concentrations of microbubbles is essential to improve molecular imaging techniques. In order to assess the effect of MCA diameter on imaging sensitivity, perfusion and molecular imaging studies were performed with microbubbles of varying size distributions. To assess signal improvement and MCA circulation time as a function of size and concentration, blood perfusion was imaged in rat kidneys using nontargeted size-sorted MCAs with a Siemens Sequoia ultrasound system (Siemans, Mountain View, CA) in cadence pulse sequencing (CPS) mode. Molecular imaging sensitivity improvements were studied with size-sorted α v ß 3 -targeted bubbles in both fibrosarcoma and R3230 rat tumor models. In perfusion imaging studies, video intensity and contrast persistence was ≈8 times and ≈3 times greater respectively, for “sorted 3-micron” MCAs (diameter, 3.3 ± 1.95 μm) when compared to “unsorted” MCAs (diameter, 0.9 ± 0.45 μm) at low concentrations. In targeted experiments, application of sorted 3-micron MCAs resulted in a ≈20 times video intensity increase over unsorted populations. Tailoring size-distributions results in substantial imaging sensitivity improvement over unsorted populations, which is essential in maximizing sensitivity to small numbers of MCAs for molecular imaging.https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2010.00005
spellingShingle Jason E. Streeter
Ryan Gessner
Iman Miles
Paul A. Dayton
Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies
Molecular Imaging
title Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies
title_full Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies
title_fullStr Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies
title_full_unstemmed Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies
title_short Improving Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging by Tailoring Contrast Agent Size Distribution: In Vivo Studies
title_sort improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution in vivo studies
url https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2010.00005
work_keys_str_mv AT jasonestreeter improvingsensitivityinultrasoundmolecularimagingbytailoringcontrastagentsizedistributioninvivostudies
AT ryangessner improvingsensitivityinultrasoundmolecularimagingbytailoringcontrastagentsizedistributioninvivostudies
AT imanmiles improvingsensitivityinultrasoundmolecularimagingbytailoringcontrastagentsizedistributioninvivostudies
AT pauladayton improvingsensitivityinultrasoundmolecularimagingbytailoringcontrastagentsizedistributioninvivostudies