Clinical outcome and genomic biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies for cancer of unknown primary: a multicenter, real-world study

Abstract Background Given the limited treatment options recommended for cancer of unknown primary (CUP), especially the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs and identify associated genomic biomarkers in these patients. Methods This retrospecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunjie Huang, Riqing Huang, Meiting Chen, Zhousan Zheng, Haifeng Li, Rishang Chen, Tinghua Gao, Ditian Shu, Anqi Hu, Qiufan Zheng, Xin An, Yanxia Shi, Cong Xue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06261-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Given the limited treatment options recommended for cancer of unknown primary (CUP), especially the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs and identify associated genomic biomarkers in these patients. Methods This retrospective, multicenter, real-world analysis included individuals with oncologist-confirmed CUP cases treated with ICIs across four hospitals in China. Clinical outcomes, safety and biomarkers were analyzed. Results Between January 2016 and November 2023, 124 patients were enrolled. Of these, 117 patients underwent combination therapy, predominantly ICIs with taxane-platinum based chemotherapy (54.84%), while 7 received monotherapy. After a median follow-up of 18.6 months, the median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 23.20 and 38.86 months, respectively. According to ESMO guideline, patients were stratified into favorable (n = 41) and unfavorable subset (n = 83). The favorable subset demonstrated significantly longer PFS and OS than the unfavorable subset (median PFS NR vs. 9.7 months, P < 0.001; median OS NR vs. 23.73 months, P < 0.001). There are 31 patients in our cohort whose PD-L1 detection results are available, while 25 patients was eligible for TMB assessment. Better clinical efficacy of ICIs was apparent for tumors with a higher PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 20) and a greater tumor mutation burden (> 12 mutations/Mb). Multivariate analyses revealed that higher ECOG performance status, the presence of visceral metastasis, and KRAS mutation were independently associated with inferior PFS and OS. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 49 (39.52%) patients, with one developing grade 3 pneumonia. Conclusions The application of ICIs showed encouraging efficacy with an acceptable safety profile, suggesting its potential as an additional therapeutic option for CUP patients. Identifying predictive markers for ICIs response remains essential to enhance therapeutic strategies in CUP management.
ISSN:1432-1335