Evaluating science: A comparison of human and AI reviewers

Scientists have started to explore whether novel artificial intelligence (AI) tools based on large language models, such as GPT-4, could support the scientific peer review process. We sought to understand (i) whether AI versus human reviewers are able to distinguish between made-up AI-generated and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Shcherbiak, Hooman Habibnia, Robert Böhm, Susann Fiedler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S193029752400024X/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!