Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?

Abstract Accurate forecasting of the arrival time and arrival speed of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is an unsolved problem in space weather research. In this study, a comparison of the predicted arrival times and speeds for each CME based, independently, on the inputs from the two STEREO vantage po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jürgen Hinterreiter, Tanja Amerstorfer, Martin A. Reiss, Christian Möstl, Manuela Temmer, Maike Bauer, Ute V. Amerstorfer, Rachel L. Bailey, Andreas J. Weiss, Jackie A. Davies, Luke A. Barnard, Mathew J. Owens
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:Space Weather
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002674
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536411646296064
author Jürgen Hinterreiter
Tanja Amerstorfer
Martin A. Reiss
Christian Möstl
Manuela Temmer
Maike Bauer
Ute V. Amerstorfer
Rachel L. Bailey
Andreas J. Weiss
Jackie A. Davies
Luke A. Barnard
Mathew J. Owens
author_facet Jürgen Hinterreiter
Tanja Amerstorfer
Martin A. Reiss
Christian Möstl
Manuela Temmer
Maike Bauer
Ute V. Amerstorfer
Rachel L. Bailey
Andreas J. Weiss
Jackie A. Davies
Luke A. Barnard
Mathew J. Owens
author_sort Jürgen Hinterreiter
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Accurate forecasting of the arrival time and arrival speed of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is an unsolved problem in space weather research. In this study, a comparison of the predicted arrival times and speeds for each CME based, independently, on the inputs from the two STEREO vantage points is carried out. We perform hindcasts using ELlipse Evolution model based on Heliospheric Imager observations (ELEvoHI) ensemble modeling. An estimate of the ambient solar wind conditions is obtained by the Wang‐Sheeley‐Arge/Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation (WSA/HUX) model combination that serves as input to ELEvoHI. We carefully select 12 CMEs between February 2010 and July 2012 that show clear signatures in both STEREO‐A and STEREO‐B HI time‐elongation maps, that propagate close to the ecliptic plane, and that have corresponding in situ signatures at Earth. We find a mean arrival time difference of 6.5 h between predictions from the two different viewpoints, which can reach up to 9.5 h for individual CMEs, while the mean arrival speed difference is 63 km s−1. An ambient solar wind with a large speed variance leads to larger differences in the STEREO‐A and STEREO‐B CME arrival time predictions (cc = 0.92). Additionally, we compare the predicted arrivals, from both spacecraft, to the actual in situ arrivals at Earth and find a mean absolute error of 7.5 ± 9.5 h for the arrival time and 87 ± 111 km s−1 for the arrival speed. There is no tendency for one spacecraft to provide more accurate arrival predictions than the other.
format Article
id doaj-art-7678eca4db5f40a484de0fbae8576335
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-7678eca4db5f40a484de0fbae85763352025-01-14T16:30:38ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902021-03-01193n/an/a10.1029/2020SW002674Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?Jürgen Hinterreiter0Tanja Amerstorfer1Martin A. Reiss2Christian Möstl3Manuela Temmer4Maike Bauer5Ute V. Amerstorfer6Rachel L. Bailey7Andreas J. Weiss8Jackie A. Davies9Luke A. Barnard10Mathew J. Owens11Space Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaSpace Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaSpace Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaSpace Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaInstitute of Physics University of Graz Graz AustriaSpace Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaSpace Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaConrad Observatory Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik Vienna AustriaSpace Research Institute Austrian Academy of Sciences Graz AustriaRAL Space Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Didcot UKDepartment of Meteorology University of Reading Reading UKDepartment of Meteorology University of Reading Reading UKAbstract Accurate forecasting of the arrival time and arrival speed of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) is an unsolved problem in space weather research. In this study, a comparison of the predicted arrival times and speeds for each CME based, independently, on the inputs from the two STEREO vantage points is carried out. We perform hindcasts using ELlipse Evolution model based on Heliospheric Imager observations (ELEvoHI) ensemble modeling. An estimate of the ambient solar wind conditions is obtained by the Wang‐Sheeley‐Arge/Heliospheric Upwind eXtrapolation (WSA/HUX) model combination that serves as input to ELEvoHI. We carefully select 12 CMEs between February 2010 and July 2012 that show clear signatures in both STEREO‐A and STEREO‐B HI time‐elongation maps, that propagate close to the ecliptic plane, and that have corresponding in situ signatures at Earth. We find a mean arrival time difference of 6.5 h between predictions from the two different viewpoints, which can reach up to 9.5 h for individual CMEs, while the mean arrival speed difference is 63 km s−1. An ambient solar wind with a large speed variance leads to larger differences in the STEREO‐A and STEREO‐B CME arrival time predictions (cc = 0.92). Additionally, we compare the predicted arrivals, from both spacecraft, to the actual in situ arrivals at Earth and find a mean absolute error of 7.5 ± 9.5 h for the arrival time and 87 ± 111 km s−1 for the arrival speed. There is no tendency for one spacecraft to provide more accurate arrival predictions than the other.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002674
spellingShingle Jürgen Hinterreiter
Tanja Amerstorfer
Martin A. Reiss
Christian Möstl
Manuela Temmer
Maike Bauer
Ute V. Amerstorfer
Rachel L. Bailey
Andreas J. Weiss
Jackie A. Davies
Luke A. Barnard
Mathew J. Owens
Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?
Space Weather
title Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?
title_full Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?
title_fullStr Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?
title_full_unstemmed Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?
title_short Why are ELEvoHI CME Arrival Predictions Different if Based on STEREO‐A or STEREO‐B Heliospheric Imager Observations?
title_sort why are elevohi cme arrival predictions different if based on stereo a or stereo b heliospheric imager observations
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020SW002674
work_keys_str_mv AT jurgenhinterreiter whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT tanjaamerstorfer whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT martinareiss whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT christianmostl whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT manuelatemmer whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT maikebauer whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT utevamerstorfer whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT rachellbailey whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT andreasjweiss whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT jackieadavies whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT lukeabarnard whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations
AT mathewjowens whyareelevohicmearrivalpredictionsdifferentifbasedonstereoaorstereobheliosphericimagerobservations