Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids

Surgery has traditionally been the primary treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. However, office-based interventions such as rubber band ligation (RBL) are increasingly used for Grades 1–3 hemorrhoids. Flexible endoscopic RBL offers a minimally invasive alternative, whereas surgery remains...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Diyaree Nihad Ismael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Human Development 2025-06-01
Series:UHD Journal of Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uhd.edu.iq/index.php/uhdjst/article/view/1419
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225481768927232
author Diyaree Nihad Ismael
author_facet Diyaree Nihad Ismael
author_sort Diyaree Nihad Ismael
collection DOAJ
description Surgery has traditionally been the primary treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. However, office-based interventions such as rubber band ligation (RBL) are increasingly used for Grades 1–3 hemorrhoids. Flexible endoscopic RBL offers a minimally invasive alternative, whereas surgery remains standard for Grade 4. To compare the effectiveness of flexible endoscopic RBL versus surgical hemorrhoidectomy in managing symptomatic Grades 1–3 internal hemorrhoids, focusing on bleeding control, pain, recovery time, and recurrence. A comparative study of 55 patients treated with flexible endoscopic RBL (using Olympus kits) and 55 matched patients undergoing conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy (open technique). Patients choose their treatment after counseling. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year, with follow-up at 1 week, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (≥4 defined significant pain). Statistical analysis used a statistical package for the social sciences v26 (t-tests for continuous variables, Chi-square for categorical; P < 0.05 significant). Both groups showed comparable efficacy: Bleeding control (95% vs. 93%), mucosal prolapse resolution (96% vs. 97%), and 1-year recurrence (30% vs. 29%). RBL had superior post-procedural outcomes: Lower pain (10% vs. 90%), fewer work absences (5% vs. 95%), and no bed-boundness (0% vs. 100%; all P < 0.05). Flexible endoscopic RBL is as effective as surgery for Grades 1–3 hemorrhoids but significantly reduces pain, recovery time, and work absenteeism. RBL should be considered a first-line option for eligible patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-74e45a69b4e94798b6d2631fac693273
institution Kabale University
issn 2521-4209
2521-4217
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher University of Human Development
record_format Article
series UHD Journal of Science and Technology
spelling doaj-art-74e45a69b4e94798b6d2631fac6932732025-08-24T18:44:49ZengUniversity of Human DevelopmentUHD Journal of Science and Technology2521-42092521-42172025-06-019118118410.21928/uhdjst.v9n1y2025.pp181-1841552Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal HemorrhoidsDiyaree Nihad Ismael0Senior General Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital, Sulaimanyah, IraqSurgery has traditionally been the primary treatment for symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. However, office-based interventions such as rubber band ligation (RBL) are increasingly used for Grades 1–3 hemorrhoids. Flexible endoscopic RBL offers a minimally invasive alternative, whereas surgery remains standard for Grade 4. To compare the effectiveness of flexible endoscopic RBL versus surgical hemorrhoidectomy in managing symptomatic Grades 1–3 internal hemorrhoids, focusing on bleeding control, pain, recovery time, and recurrence. A comparative study of 55 patients treated with flexible endoscopic RBL (using Olympus kits) and 55 matched patients undergoing conventional excisional hemorrhoidectomy (open technique). Patients choose their treatment after counseling. Outcomes were assessed over 1 year, with follow-up at 1 week, 3, 6, and 12 months. Pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (≥4 defined significant pain). Statistical analysis used a statistical package for the social sciences v26 (t-tests for continuous variables, Chi-square for categorical; P < 0.05 significant). Both groups showed comparable efficacy: Bleeding control (95% vs. 93%), mucosal prolapse resolution (96% vs. 97%), and 1-year recurrence (30% vs. 29%). RBL had superior post-procedural outcomes: Lower pain (10% vs. 90%), fewer work absences (5% vs. 95%), and no bed-boundness (0% vs. 100%; all P < 0.05). Flexible endoscopic RBL is as effective as surgery for Grades 1–3 hemorrhoids but significantly reduces pain, recovery time, and work absenteeism. RBL should be considered a first-line option for eligible patients.https://journals.uhd.edu.iq/index.php/uhdjst/article/view/1419rubber band ligationinternal pileshemorrhoidectomy
spellingShingle Diyaree Nihad Ismael
Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids
UHD Journal of Science and Technology
rubber band ligation
internal piles
hemorrhoidectomy
title Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids
title_full Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids
title_fullStr Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids
title_full_unstemmed Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids
title_short Surgery Versus Flexible Endoscopic Rubber Band Ligation for Grade 2 and 3 Internal Hemorrhoids
title_sort surgery versus flexible endoscopic rubber band ligation for grade 2 and 3 internal hemorrhoids
topic rubber band ligation
internal piles
hemorrhoidectomy
url https://journals.uhd.edu.iq/index.php/uhdjst/article/view/1419
work_keys_str_mv AT diyareenihadismael surgeryversusflexibleendoscopicrubberbandligationforgrade2and3internalhemorrhoids