Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective

Females and males have different proficiency levels in their use of technology. Females exhibit lower confidence and self-efficacy toward digital technologies compared to males. This study aims to explore gender differences in the preference for e-learning tools for collaborative learning and assess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tendayi C. Garutsa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Noyam Journals 2025-04-01
Series:Journal of Education and Learning Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/JELT2025648.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850205301032091648
author Tendayi C. Garutsa
author_facet Tendayi C. Garutsa
author_sort Tendayi C. Garutsa
collection DOAJ
description Females and males have different proficiency levels in their use of technology. Females exhibit lower confidence and self-efficacy toward digital technologies compared to males. This study aims to explore gender differences in the preference for e-learning tools for collaborative learning and assessment purposes in the Faculty of Humanities at North-West University, South Africa. A sequential explanatory research design was employed, with questionnaires administered in the first phase and interviews conducted in the second phase. The qualitative data was analysed using content thematic analysis. The quantitative data was analysed using simple descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test, a non-parametric statistical test, to compare differences between female and male students in e-learning tool preferences. The findings from the analysis of gender-based preferences for collaborative learning and e-learning assessment tools revealed distinct trends, with some tools showing significant gender-based preferences while others do not. These results suggest that while gender may influence the choice of certain educational technologies, the factors underlying these preferences are multifaceted, involving utility, ease of use, and the perceived effectiveness of the tools. This study recommends that institutions of higher learning incorporate gender-sensitive tools like Zoom Chat and Graphical Assessments, while providing training for educators on multimedia design and collaborative platforms. Additionally, enhancing IT infrastructure, offering user guides, and conducting workshops or peer mentoring sessions can improve accessibility, collaboration, and technical support for all students.
format Article
id doaj-art-6efaa125799e4f4d8a229b2ca160ad9b
institution OA Journals
issn 2720-7730
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Noyam Journals
record_format Article
series Journal of Education and Learning Technology
spelling doaj-art-6efaa125799e4f4d8a229b2ca160ad9b2025-08-20T02:11:08ZengNoyam JournalsJournal of Education and Learning Technology2720-77302025-04-0164235248https://doi.org/10.38159/jelt.2025648Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African PerspectiveTendayi C. Garutsa0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-2764Department of Sociology, North-West University, Mahikeng, South AfricaFemales and males have different proficiency levels in their use of technology. Females exhibit lower confidence and self-efficacy toward digital technologies compared to males. This study aims to explore gender differences in the preference for e-learning tools for collaborative learning and assessment purposes in the Faculty of Humanities at North-West University, South Africa. A sequential explanatory research design was employed, with questionnaires administered in the first phase and interviews conducted in the second phase. The qualitative data was analysed using content thematic analysis. The quantitative data was analysed using simple descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U test, a non-parametric statistical test, to compare differences between female and male students in e-learning tool preferences. The findings from the analysis of gender-based preferences for collaborative learning and e-learning assessment tools revealed distinct trends, with some tools showing significant gender-based preferences while others do not. These results suggest that while gender may influence the choice of certain educational technologies, the factors underlying these preferences are multifaceted, involving utility, ease of use, and the perceived effectiveness of the tools. This study recommends that institutions of higher learning incorporate gender-sensitive tools like Zoom Chat and Graphical Assessments, while providing training for educators on multimedia design and collaborative platforms. Additionally, enhancing IT infrastructure, offering user guides, and conducting workshops or peer mentoring sessions can improve accessibility, collaboration, and technical support for all students.https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/JELT2025648.pdfe-learning toolsgenderhigher learning.
spellingShingle Tendayi C. Garutsa
Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective
Journal of Education and Learning Technology
e-learning tools
gender
higher learning.
title Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective
title_full Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective
title_fullStr Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective
title_short Exploring Gender Preferences for Collaborative and Assessment E-Learning Tools: A South African Perspective
title_sort exploring gender preferences for collaborative and assessment e learning tools a south african perspective
topic e-learning tools
gender
higher learning.
url https://noyam.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/JELT2025648.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tendayicgarutsa exploringgenderpreferencesforcollaborativeandassessmentelearningtoolsasouthafricanperspective