Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the effects of caudal block anesthesia with hydromorphone-ropivacaine compared to ropivacaine alone on postoperative immune function and pain management in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Methods A total of 100 pediatric patients were randoml...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuzhu Cai, Mingwen Yang, Xinghui Liu, Lingli Zhang, Jun Wang, Yingying Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:BMC Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03053-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850184417822113792
author Yuzhu Cai
Mingwen Yang
Xinghui Liu
Lingli Zhang
Jun Wang
Yingying Sun
author_facet Yuzhu Cai
Mingwen Yang
Xinghui Liu
Lingli Zhang
Jun Wang
Yingying Sun
author_sort Yuzhu Cai
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the effects of caudal block anesthesia with hydromorphone-ropivacaine compared to ropivacaine alone on postoperative immune function and pain management in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Methods A total of 100 pediatric patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the Hydromorphone-Ropivacaine (HR) group and the Ropivacaine (R) group for caudal block anesthesia, with 50 patients in each group. The R group received 0.25% ropivacaine at a dose of 1 ml/kg, while the HR group received 0.25% ropivacaine (1 ml/kg) combined with hydromorphone (10 µg/kg). The maximum dose for both groups was capped at 30 ml (1 ml/kg). Anesthesia induction included intravenous administration of pentobarbital (0.01 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg), followed by sevoflurane inhalation. All patients underwent ultrasound-guided caudal block anesthesia administered by the same anesthetist. Primary outcomes included the distribution of T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8 + ratios) measured at five time points: pre-anesthesia (T0), end of surgery (T1), 24 h postoperatively (T2), 48 h postoperatively (T3), and 72 h postoperatively (T4). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores assessed using the Modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (M-CHEOPS) at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively, sedation levels evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale at the same time points, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. Results The HR group exhibited significant reductions in CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios at T1, T2, and T3 compared to baseline (T0) (p < 0.001). At all postoperative time points (T1, T2, T3, T4), the HR group demonstrated significantly higher levels of CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios compared to the R group (p < 0.001). By T4 (72 h postoperatively), immune markers in the HR group had largely normalized to baseline levels, whereas those in the R group remained significantly lower (p < 0.001). Postoperative pain, assessed using the Modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (M-CHEOPS), was significantly lower in the HR group at 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively compared to the R group (p < 0.001). The HR group also exhibited a longer duration of analgesia and required fewer doses of rescue analgesia within the first 24 h postoperatively (p = 0.046). Sedation levels, evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale, showed significant differences between the groups at 1 h (p = 0.0087) and 6 h (p < 0.0001) postoperatively, with higher sedation scores observed in the HR group. There were no significant differences in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, or oxygen saturation between the groups at any time point (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative adverse reactions (all p > 0.05). Conclusion Caudal block anesthesia with hydromorphone-ropivacaine offers enhanced postoperative pain relief and a lesser impact on immune function compared to ropivacaine alone in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Further studies are warranted to explore the long-term effects on immune function.
format Article
id doaj-art-6c0ac159baf1481cbdd2e745b52cf277
institution OA Journals
issn 1471-2253
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Anesthesiology
spelling doaj-art-6c0ac159baf1481cbdd2e745b52cf2772025-08-20T02:17:02ZengBMCBMC Anesthesiology1471-22532025-04-0125111110.1186/s12871-025-03053-7Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in childrenYuzhu Cai0Mingwen Yang1Xinghui Liu2Lingli Zhang3Jun Wang4Yingying Sun5Department of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Children’s HospitalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Anhui Provincial Children’s HospitalAbstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the effects of caudal block anesthesia with hydromorphone-ropivacaine compared to ropivacaine alone on postoperative immune function and pain management in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Methods A total of 100 pediatric patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the Hydromorphone-Ropivacaine (HR) group and the Ropivacaine (R) group for caudal block anesthesia, with 50 patients in each group. The R group received 0.25% ropivacaine at a dose of 1 ml/kg, while the HR group received 0.25% ropivacaine (1 ml/kg) combined with hydromorphone (10 µg/kg). The maximum dose for both groups was capped at 30 ml (1 ml/kg). Anesthesia induction included intravenous administration of pentobarbital (0.01 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg), followed by sevoflurane inhalation. All patients underwent ultrasound-guided caudal block anesthesia administered by the same anesthetist. Primary outcomes included the distribution of T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD4+/CD8 + ratios) measured at five time points: pre-anesthesia (T0), end of surgery (T1), 24 h postoperatively (T2), 48 h postoperatively (T3), and 72 h postoperatively (T4). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores assessed using the Modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (M-CHEOPS) at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively, sedation levels evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale at the same time points, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events. Results The HR group exhibited significant reductions in CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios at T1, T2, and T3 compared to baseline (T0) (p < 0.001). At all postoperative time points (T1, T2, T3, T4), the HR group demonstrated significantly higher levels of CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ ratios compared to the R group (p < 0.001). By T4 (72 h postoperatively), immune markers in the HR group had largely normalized to baseline levels, whereas those in the R group remained significantly lower (p < 0.001). Postoperative pain, assessed using the Modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (M-CHEOPS), was significantly lower in the HR group at 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively compared to the R group (p < 0.001). The HR group also exhibited a longer duration of analgesia and required fewer doses of rescue analgesia within the first 24 h postoperatively (p = 0.046). Sedation levels, evaluated using the Ramsay sedation scale, showed significant differences between the groups at 1 h (p = 0.0087) and 6 h (p < 0.0001) postoperatively, with higher sedation scores observed in the HR group. There were no significant differences in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, or oxygen saturation between the groups at any time point (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of postoperative adverse reactions (all p > 0.05). Conclusion Caudal block anesthesia with hydromorphone-ropivacaine offers enhanced postoperative pain relief and a lesser impact on immune function compared to ropivacaine alone in children undergoing hypospadias surgery. Further studies are warranted to explore the long-term effects on immune function.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03053-7HydromorphoneRopivacaineCaudal blockHypospadias surgeryImmune functionT lymphocyte subsets
spellingShingle Yuzhu Cai
Mingwen Yang
Xinghui Liu
Lingli Zhang
Jun Wang
Yingying Sun
Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
BMC Anesthesiology
Hydromorphone
Ropivacaine
Caudal block
Hypospadias surgery
Immune function
T lymphocyte subsets
title Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
title_full Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
title_fullStr Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
title_full_unstemmed Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
title_short Effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
title_sort effect of hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine caudal block on immune function after hypospadias surgery in children
topic Hydromorphone
Ropivacaine
Caudal block
Hypospadias surgery
Immune function
T lymphocyte subsets
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03053-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yuzhucai effectofhydromorphonecombinedwithropivacainecaudalblockonimmunefunctionafterhypospadiassurgeryinchildren
AT mingwenyang effectofhydromorphonecombinedwithropivacainecaudalblockonimmunefunctionafterhypospadiassurgeryinchildren
AT xinghuiliu effectofhydromorphonecombinedwithropivacainecaudalblockonimmunefunctionafterhypospadiassurgeryinchildren
AT linglizhang effectofhydromorphonecombinedwithropivacainecaudalblockonimmunefunctionafterhypospadiassurgeryinchildren
AT junwang effectofhydromorphonecombinedwithropivacainecaudalblockonimmunefunctionafterhypospadiassurgeryinchildren
AT yingyingsun effectofhydromorphonecombinedwithropivacainecaudalblockonimmunefunctionafterhypospadiassurgeryinchildren