Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas

Background: Non-surgical treatments are cost-effective options for low-risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) i.e. superficial or small nodular BCCs located outside the high-risk locations. Hexyl aminolevulinate (HAL) and 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) with enhanced penetration depth ena...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Salmivuori, M. Grönroos, T. Tani, J. Räsänen, E. Snellman, N. Neittaanmäki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-02-01
Series:Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157210002400468X
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575515582529536
author M. Salmivuori
M. Grönroos
T. Tani
J. Räsänen
E. Snellman
N. Neittaanmäki
author_facet M. Salmivuori
M. Grönroos
T. Tani
J. Räsänen
E. Snellman
N. Neittaanmäki
author_sort M. Salmivuori
collection DOAJ
description Background: Non-surgical treatments are cost-effective options for low-risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) i.e. superficial or small nodular BCCs located outside the high-risk locations. Hexyl aminolevulinate (HAL) and 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) with enhanced penetration depth enables the use of lower concentrations compared to methylaminolevulinate (MAL) in photodynamic therapy (PDT). We have previously reported comparable short-term efficacies for MAL 16 %, BF-200 ALA 7.8 % and HAL 2 % in PDT of low-risk BCC, and here we report the long-term results. Objectives: The goal of this trial was to compare long-term outcomes of HAL and BF-200 ALA, compared to MAL in PDT of low-risk BCCs. Methods: Ninety-eight histologically verified low-risk BCCs on the trunk or extremities were included and randomized into three arms to receive PDT in two sessions with MAL, BF-200 ALA or HAL. A blinded dermatologist assessed the response, cosmetic outcome, and obtained biopsies for histological verification at three months, one year and five years. Histologically verified non-responsive lesions were excised. Patients’ satisfaction with the treatment was also queried. Results: According to intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, the cumulative response rate at one year was 90.6 % for MAL, 81.3 % for BF-200 ALA, and 75.8 % for HAL, and correspondingly at five years 71.9 %, 54.6 % and 60.6 %. There were no statistically significant differences between interventions and comparator. The overall cumulative response rate for PDT was 82.5 % at one year and 62.2 % at five, and 48.6 % of the treatment failures were recorded at five years. The recurrent lesions were excised as second line treatment. No aggressive subtypes were reported, with only superficial or nodular growth in the final histopathological report. There were no significant differences in cosmetic outcome or patient satisfaction. Conclusions: This trial shows that HAL has potential for dermatological PDT. However, the long-term efficacy of PDT in the treatment of low-risk BCCs remains rather low.
format Article
id doaj-art-5d455986964443919c0ae26d28710b37
institution Kabale University
issn 1572-1000
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
spelling doaj-art-5d455986964443919c0ae26d28710b372025-02-01T04:11:41ZengElsevierPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy1572-10002025-02-0151104432Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell CarcinomasM. Salmivuori0M. Grönroos1T. Tani2J. Räsänen3E. Snellman4N. Neittaanmäki5Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Wellbeing services of Päijät-Häme and Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7 15850 Lahti, Finland; Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland; Corresponding author: Meilahdentie 2, PL 160, 00250 00029 HUS, Finland.Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Wellbeing services of Päijät-Häme and Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7 15850 Lahti, Finland; Skin Hospital/Suomen Ihosairaala, FinlandHUSLAB Laboratory Services, Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, FinlandDepartment of Dermatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, FinlandDepartment of Dermatology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Tampere University, Tampere, FinlandDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Clinical Pathology, Gothenburg, SwedenBackground: Non-surgical treatments are cost-effective options for low-risk basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) i.e. superficial or small nodular BCCs located outside the high-risk locations. Hexyl aminolevulinate (HAL) and 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion (BF-200 ALA) with enhanced penetration depth enables the use of lower concentrations compared to methylaminolevulinate (MAL) in photodynamic therapy (PDT). We have previously reported comparable short-term efficacies for MAL 16 %, BF-200 ALA 7.8 % and HAL 2 % in PDT of low-risk BCC, and here we report the long-term results. Objectives: The goal of this trial was to compare long-term outcomes of HAL and BF-200 ALA, compared to MAL in PDT of low-risk BCCs. Methods: Ninety-eight histologically verified low-risk BCCs on the trunk or extremities were included and randomized into three arms to receive PDT in two sessions with MAL, BF-200 ALA or HAL. A blinded dermatologist assessed the response, cosmetic outcome, and obtained biopsies for histological verification at three months, one year and five years. Histologically verified non-responsive lesions were excised. Patients’ satisfaction with the treatment was also queried. Results: According to intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, the cumulative response rate at one year was 90.6 % for MAL, 81.3 % for BF-200 ALA, and 75.8 % for HAL, and correspondingly at five years 71.9 %, 54.6 % and 60.6 %. There were no statistically significant differences between interventions and comparator. The overall cumulative response rate for PDT was 82.5 % at one year and 62.2 % at five, and 48.6 % of the treatment failures were recorded at five years. The recurrent lesions were excised as second line treatment. No aggressive subtypes were reported, with only superficial or nodular growth in the final histopathological report. There were no significant differences in cosmetic outcome or patient satisfaction. Conclusions: This trial shows that HAL has potential for dermatological PDT. However, the long-term efficacy of PDT in the treatment of low-risk BCCs remains rather low.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157210002400468XBasal cell carcinomaPhotodynamic therapyHexyl aminolevulinateLong-term follow-up
spellingShingle M. Salmivuori
M. Grönroos
T. Tani
J. Räsänen
E. Snellman
N. Neittaanmäki
Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
Basal cell carcinoma
Photodynamic therapy
Hexyl aminolevulinate
Long-term follow-up
title Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas
title_full Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas
title_fullStr Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas
title_short Long-term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate, 5-aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low-risk Basal Cell Carcinomas
title_sort long term outcome of photodynamic therapy with hexyl aminolevulinate 5 aminolevulinic acid nanoemulsion and methyl aminolevulinate for low risk basal cell carcinomas
topic Basal cell carcinoma
Photodynamic therapy
Hexyl aminolevulinate
Long-term follow-up
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157210002400468X
work_keys_str_mv AT msalmivuori longtermoutcomeofphotodynamictherapywithhexylaminolevulinate5aminolevulinicacidnanoemulsionandmethylaminolevulinateforlowriskbasalcellcarcinomas
AT mgronroos longtermoutcomeofphotodynamictherapywithhexylaminolevulinate5aminolevulinicacidnanoemulsionandmethylaminolevulinateforlowriskbasalcellcarcinomas
AT ttani longtermoutcomeofphotodynamictherapywithhexylaminolevulinate5aminolevulinicacidnanoemulsionandmethylaminolevulinateforlowriskbasalcellcarcinomas
AT jrasanen longtermoutcomeofphotodynamictherapywithhexylaminolevulinate5aminolevulinicacidnanoemulsionandmethylaminolevulinateforlowriskbasalcellcarcinomas
AT esnellman longtermoutcomeofphotodynamictherapywithhexylaminolevulinate5aminolevulinicacidnanoemulsionandmethylaminolevulinateforlowriskbasalcellcarcinomas
AT nneittaanmaki longtermoutcomeofphotodynamictherapywithhexylaminolevulinate5aminolevulinicacidnanoemulsionandmethylaminolevulinateforlowriskbasalcellcarcinomas