Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study

BackgroundEnhanced learning is achieved when assessments are effectively designed in alignment with the learning objectives and supported by ongoing research in the field. Although it is universally acknowledged that assessments are essential in medical education, little is known about assessment po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eman Khalaf, Farah Ennab, Farah Otaki, Shaista Salman Guraya, Fatemeh Amir-Rad, Erum Khan, Ritu Lakhtakia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1620437/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849685031355678720
author Eman Khalaf
Farah Ennab
Farah Otaki
Farah Otaki
Shaista Salman Guraya
Fatemeh Amir-Rad
Fatemeh Amir-Rad
Erum Khan
Ritu Lakhtakia
author_facet Eman Khalaf
Farah Ennab
Farah Otaki
Farah Otaki
Shaista Salman Guraya
Fatemeh Amir-Rad
Fatemeh Amir-Rad
Erum Khan
Ritu Lakhtakia
author_sort Eman Khalaf
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundEnhanced learning is achieved when assessments are effectively designed in alignment with the learning objectives and supported by ongoing research in the field. Although it is universally acknowledged that assessments are essential in medical education, little is known about assessment policy and characteristics, and its influence on learning and teaching in medical schools in the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of medical students of the assessment method implemented in a medical school in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.MethodsA convergent mixed methods study design was employed. Quantitative and qualitative data were independently collected and analyzed. The quantitative component comprised a cross-sectional observational survey design where a tailormade survey with a five-point Likert-type scale was administered to 87 undergraduate medical students. The corresponding quantitative data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 27.0). As for the qualitative data, it was collected through a series of focus group sessions aimed at exploring students’ perception of assessment and its impact on their learning. The corresponding analysis was inductive, following the six-step approach introduced by Braun and Clarke. Following that, merging of the information brought about from the two sources generated meta-inferences, which raised the validity of the study’s findings.ResultsThe percentage of the total average of agreement of the current assessment method efficacy, according to a tailormade survey protocol of 28 components, measured using a five-point Likert-type scale, was 62.24%. This percentage was calculated by dividing the overall mean (i.e., 87.13) by 140 since it is the maximum possible value (i.e., five of the Likert-type scale multiplied by 28 components) and multiplying it by 100. The inductive thematic analysis of the data, collected via focus group sessions, yielded a novel conceptual framework: “Medical Students” Take on Assessment Method’, with two overarching themes: Development Process and Consequences. Within the Development Process theme, two categories emerged: Assessment plan and Student support. As for the Consequences theme, it included three other categories: Output, Outcomes, and Impact. Lastly, the following four meta-inferences emerged from integrating the quantitative with the qualitative analysis findings: Processual perspective, Learners’ reaction, Inclusiveness, and Ripple effects.ConclusionThis study reinforced the importance of effectively assessing medical students’ competences while maximizing the learning value of the encapsulating assessment method. It showed that it is not about making choices around discrete aspects of assessment, but rather to consider an assessment method holistically as dynamic processes with several moving parts. Ideally, assessment methods should be designed, implemented, and maintained in ways that would maximize their learning value, taking into account the corresponding context and learners’ perception.
format Article
id doaj-art-4fff1f6a1ed34eaf87c488bb5566ce02
institution DOAJ
issn 2296-858X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-4fff1f6a1ed34eaf87c488bb5566ce022025-08-20T03:23:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-08-011210.3389/fmed.2025.16204371620437Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods studyEman Khalaf0Farah Ennab1Farah Otaki2Farah Otaki3Shaista Salman Guraya4Fatemeh Amir-Rad5Fatemeh Amir-Rad6Erum Khan7Ritu Lakhtakia8Al Amal Psychiatric Hospital, Emirates Health Services, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesInstitute of Learning (IoL), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesStrategy and Institutional Excellence (SIE), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesDepartment of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences (FHML), Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, NetherlandsInstitute of Learning (IoL), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesHamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine (HBMCDM), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United KingdomCollege of Medicine, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab EmiratesCollege of Medicine (CoM), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Dubai Health, Dubai, United Arab EmiratesBackgroundEnhanced learning is achieved when assessments are effectively designed in alignment with the learning objectives and supported by ongoing research in the field. Although it is universally acknowledged that assessments are essential in medical education, little is known about assessment policy and characteristics, and its influence on learning and teaching in medical schools in the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of medical students of the assessment method implemented in a medical school in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.MethodsA convergent mixed methods study design was employed. Quantitative and qualitative data were independently collected and analyzed. The quantitative component comprised a cross-sectional observational survey design where a tailormade survey with a five-point Likert-type scale was administered to 87 undergraduate medical students. The corresponding quantitative data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 27.0). As for the qualitative data, it was collected through a series of focus group sessions aimed at exploring students’ perception of assessment and its impact on their learning. The corresponding analysis was inductive, following the six-step approach introduced by Braun and Clarke. Following that, merging of the information brought about from the two sources generated meta-inferences, which raised the validity of the study’s findings.ResultsThe percentage of the total average of agreement of the current assessment method efficacy, according to a tailormade survey protocol of 28 components, measured using a five-point Likert-type scale, was 62.24%. This percentage was calculated by dividing the overall mean (i.e., 87.13) by 140 since it is the maximum possible value (i.e., five of the Likert-type scale multiplied by 28 components) and multiplying it by 100. The inductive thematic analysis of the data, collected via focus group sessions, yielded a novel conceptual framework: “Medical Students” Take on Assessment Method’, with two overarching themes: Development Process and Consequences. Within the Development Process theme, two categories emerged: Assessment plan and Student support. As for the Consequences theme, it included three other categories: Output, Outcomes, and Impact. Lastly, the following four meta-inferences emerged from integrating the quantitative with the qualitative analysis findings: Processual perspective, Learners’ reaction, Inclusiveness, and Ripple effects.ConclusionThis study reinforced the importance of effectively assessing medical students’ competences while maximizing the learning value of the encapsulating assessment method. It showed that it is not about making choices around discrete aspects of assessment, but rather to consider an assessment method holistically as dynamic processes with several moving parts. Ideally, assessment methods should be designed, implemented, and maintained in ways that would maximize their learning value, taking into account the corresponding context and learners’ perception.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1620437/fullassessmentSelf-regulated learningmixed methodshealth professions’ educationDubaiUnited Arab Emirates Sustainable Development Goals
spellingShingle Eman Khalaf
Farah Ennab
Farah Otaki
Farah Otaki
Shaista Salman Guraya
Fatemeh Amir-Rad
Fatemeh Amir-Rad
Erum Khan
Ritu Lakhtakia
Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study
Frontiers in Medicine
assessment
Self-regulated learning
mixed methods
health professions’ education
Dubai
United Arab Emirates Sustainable Development Goals
title Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study
title_full Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study
title_fullStr Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study
title_short Medical students’ perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in Dubai: a convergent mixed methods study
title_sort medical students perception of assessment and its effects on their learning in dubai a convergent mixed methods study
topic assessment
Self-regulated learning
mixed methods
health professions’ education
Dubai
United Arab Emirates Sustainable Development Goals
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1620437/full
work_keys_str_mv AT emankhalaf medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT farahennab medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT farahotaki medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT farahotaki medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT shaistasalmanguraya medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT fatemehamirrad medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT fatemehamirrad medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT erumkhan medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy
AT ritulakhtakia medicalstudentsperceptionofassessmentanditseffectsontheirlearningindubaiaconvergentmixedmethodsstudy