Efficacy of Ceftobiprole and Daptomycin at Bone Concentrations Against Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Biofilm: Results of a Dynamic In Vitro PK/PD Model

<b>Background</b>: The presence of biofilms and low antimicrobial concentrations in bone tissue make prosthetic joint infections (PJI) difficult to treat. Ceftobiprole (CTO) has a potential role in MRSA PJI. This study evaluated the efficacy of ceftobiprole and daptomycin (DAP) alone and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikel Mancheño-Losa, María Ángeles Meléndez-Carmona, Carlos Lumbreras, Jaime Lora-Tamayo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-04-01
Series:Antibiotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/14/4/386
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<b>Background</b>: The presence of biofilms and low antimicrobial concentrations in bone tissue make prosthetic joint infections (PJI) difficult to treat. Ceftobiprole (CTO) has a potential role in MRSA PJI. This study evaluated the efficacy of ceftobiprole and daptomycin (DAP) alone and in combination against MRSA biofilms at expected bone tissue concentrations. We assessed whether CTO-DAP outperformed DAP combined with a non-anti-MRSA beta-lactam (cefazolin [CZO]). <b>Methods</b>: A dynamic in vitro PK/PD biofilm model (CDC biofilm reactor) was used to simulate concentrations expected in cortical bone at a standard dosing of DAP (10 mg/kg/24 h), CTO (500 mg/8 h), and CZO (2 g/8 h), and assess performance against a 48-h MRSA biofilm from two clinical isolates that cause PJI (MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733). Time–kill curves using the log change method (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>) assessed antimicrobial efficacy over 56 h. Resistance emergence was monitored. <b>Results:</b> Although both monotherapies were active, neither reached bactericidal levels nor was one superior to the other (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup> CTO vs. DAP: −1.44 ± 0.25 vs. −1.50 ± 0.01 [<i>p</i> = 0.686] and −1.55 ± 0.74 vs. −0.56 ± 0.36 [<i>p</i> = 0.108] for MRSA-1811 and MRSA-1733, respectively). Only in the MRSA-1811 isolate did the CTO-DAP combination improve the activity of each monotherapy, without achieving a synergistic effect (Δlog<sub>10</sub> CFU/cm<sup>2</sup>: CTO-DAP −2.087 ± 0.048 vs. CTO −1.436 ± 0.249 [<i>p</i> = 0.013] and vs. DAP −1.503 ± 0.011 [<i>p</i> = 0.006]). No combination therapy (CTO-DAP vs. DAP-CZO) outperformed the other in either strain. No resistant bacterial subpopulations appeared with any antibiotic regimen. <b>Conclusions:</b> At clinically relevant concentrations, ceftobiprole and daptomycin showed similar activity against MRSA biofilms. The CTO-DAP combination showed comparable efficacy to DAP-CZO.
ISSN:2079-6382