Misleading Higher-Order Evidence, Conflicting Ideals, and Defeasible Logic

Thinking about misleading higher-order evidence naturally leads to a puzzle about epistemic rationality: If one’s total evidence can be radically misleading regarding itself, then two widely-accepted requirements of rationality come into conflict, suggesting that there are rational dilemmas. This pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aleks Knoks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Michigan Publishing 2021-12-01
Series:Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/1143/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!