Academic cheating with generative AI: Exploring a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior

As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools become increasingly integrated into educational environments, concerns have emerged about their potential to facilitate academic dishonesty. Drawing on the modified theory of planned behavior, this study aimed to understand undergraduate students’...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dongpeng Huang, Nicole Hash, James J. Cummings, Kelsey Prena
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-06-01
Series:Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25000645
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools become increasingly integrated into educational environments, concerns have emerged about their potential to facilitate academic dishonesty. Drawing on the modified theory of planned behavior, this study aimed to understand undergraduate students’ academic cheating behaviors using GenAI. The study conducted a mixed-method approach, utilizing focus groups and polls to gather insights from 25 undergraduate students enrolled in a course that incorporated GenAI into its pedagogical design in the United States. The results revealed that the integration of GenAI into higher education is perceived as inevitable. While students clearly recognized overt cheating, opinions varied regarding subtle forms of dishonesty and the effectiveness of formal deterrents. Peer influence and personal ethics were found to strongly shape cheating behaviors, with class policies enforced by instructors exerting a greater influence on student cheating behavior with GenAI than broader institutional policies. These insights can assist educators and policymakers in managing the challenges and opportunities presented by the integration of GenAI technologies into education.
ISSN:2666-920X