Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)

<p>This study examined the potential effects of implementing the E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) technique vs. teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs) on the overlooked yet frequently used persuasive writing skill among Iranian EFL learners. Following a quasi-experimental design, 52 Iranian upper-intermediat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nasim Nasr-Esfahani, Mohsen Mahmoudi-Dehaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch 2025-03-01
Series:Research in English Language Pedagogy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/relp/Article/1186068
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849733583827107840
author Nasim Nasr-Esfahani
Mohsen Mahmoudi-Dehaki
author_facet Nasim Nasr-Esfahani
Mohsen Mahmoudi-Dehaki
author_sort Nasim Nasr-Esfahani
collection DOAJ
description <p>This study examined the potential effects of implementing the E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) technique vs. teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs) on the overlooked yet frequently used persuasive writing skill among Iranian EFL learners. Following a quasi-experimental design, 52 Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners were conveniently selected and divided into experimental and control groups in which participants in the former were taught the material using MindMeister mind-mapping software, and the ones in the latter experienced learning ethos, pathos, and logos persuasive strategies for 15 ninety-minute sessions. The instruments included the Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) and valid and reliable writing tests in the pre- and post-test phases. The results showed that while the E-M-M technique and teaching RDs enhanced persuasive writing among Iranian EFL learners, the aforementioned effect was considerably more beneficial compared to the influences of the second-mentioned. The outcomes may benefit TEFL, including EFL teachers, learners and teacher trainers, educational technology, and educational psychology.</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-3fd8b7cd6f0a41ac8dd5415ca0c193cd
institution DOAJ
issn 2588-3259
2538-4244
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch
record_format Article
series Research in English Language Pedagogy
spelling doaj-art-3fd8b7cd6f0a41ac8dd5415ca0c193cd2025-08-20T03:08:00ZengIslamic Azad University, Isfahan BranchResearch in English Language Pedagogy2588-32592538-42442025-03-01131127Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)Nasim Nasr-EsfahaniMohsen Mahmoudi-Dehaki<p>This study examined the potential effects of implementing the E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) technique vs. teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs) on the overlooked yet frequently used persuasive writing skill among Iranian EFL learners. Following a quasi-experimental design, 52 Iranian upper-intermediate EFL learners were conveniently selected and divided into experimental and control groups in which participants in the former were taught the material using MindMeister mind-mapping software, and the ones in the latter experienced learning ethos, pathos, and logos persuasive strategies for 15 ninety-minute sessions. The instruments included the Oxford Quick Placement Test (OQPT) and valid and reliable writing tests in the pre- and post-test phases. The results showed that while the E-M-M technique and teaching RDs enhanced persuasive writing among Iranian EFL learners, the aforementioned effect was considerably more beneficial compared to the influences of the second-mentioned. The outcomes may benefit TEFL, including EFL teachers, learners and teacher trainers, educational technology, and educational psychology.</p>https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/relp/Article/1186068electronic mind mapping persuasive strategies persuasive writing mindmeister rhetorical devices
spellingShingle Nasim Nasr-Esfahani
Mohsen Mahmoudi-Dehaki
Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)
Research in English Language Pedagogy
electronic mind mapping
persuasive strategies
persuasive writing
mindmeister
rhetorical devices
title Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)
title_full Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)
title_fullStr Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)
title_full_unstemmed Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)
title_short Empowering EFL Learners in Persuasive Writing: E-Mind-Mapping (E-M-M) Technique vs. Teaching Rhetorical Devices (RDs)
title_sort empowering efl learners in persuasive writing e mind mapping e m m technique vs teaching rhetorical devices rds
topic electronic mind mapping
persuasive strategies
persuasive writing
mindmeister
rhetorical devices
url https://sanad.iau.ir/journal/relp/Article/1186068
work_keys_str_mv AT nasimnasresfahani empoweringefllearnersinpersuasivewritingemindmappingemmtechniquevsteachingrhetoricaldevicesrds
AT mohsenmahmoudidehaki empoweringefllearnersinpersuasivewritingemindmappingemmtechniquevsteachingrhetoricaldevicesrds