On the Relevance of Self-Disclosure for Epistemic Responsibility
A number of authors have argued that, in order for S to be appropriately held morally responsible for some action or attitude (say, via moral blame), that action or attitude must somehow reflect or express a negative aspect of S’s (“true,” “deep,” or “real”) self. Recently, theorists of “epistemic b...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Daniel Buckley |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Michigan Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Ergo, An Open Access Journal of Philosophy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/ergo/article/id/7135/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Engaged Epistemic Agents
by: Fernando Broncano, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Epistemic Responsibility in Political Discourse (on Materials of D. Trump’s Press Conference)
by: A. I. Chepurnaya
Published: (2017-07-01) -
The Academic Scientist’s Commitment to Epistemic Responsibility
by: Bor Luen Tang
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Investigation of the Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire in Adults
by: Yusuf Bilge, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
“Knowledge was clearly associated with education.” epistemic positioning in the context of informed choice: a scoping review and secondary qualitative analysis
by: Niamh Ireland-Blake, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)