Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice
Biolog (computer aided numeric taxonomy method), gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), basic bacteriology, selective media and pathogenicity test were compared for identification of 18 pathogenic bacteria from rice. Biolog and FAMEs were more believable and rapid methods....
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Zhejiang University Press
2000-07-01
|
| Series: | 浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/1008-9209.2000.04.0353 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849247147741937664 |
|---|---|
| author | XIE Guan-lin |
| author_facet | XIE Guan-lin |
| author_sort | XIE Guan-lin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Biolog (computer aided numeric taxonomy method), gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), basic bacteriology, selective media and pathogenicity test were compared for identification of 18 pathogenic bacteria from rice. Biolog and FAMEs were more believable and rapid methods. However, they need some complemental method for identification of some pathogenic bacteria due to their limited databases. Each method has its owns advantage and pitfalls. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-2b0a100ccc19400eba443e1c695db21a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1008-9209 2097-5155 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2000-07-01 |
| publisher | Zhejiang University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | 浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版 |
| spelling | doaj-art-2b0a100ccc19400eba443e1c695db21a2025-08-20T03:58:18ZengZhejiang University Press浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版1008-92092097-51552000-07-012635335810.3785/1008-9209.2000.04.035310089209Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from riceXIE Guan-linBiolog (computer aided numeric taxonomy method), gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), basic bacteriology, selective media and pathogenicity test were compared for identification of 18 pathogenic bacteria from rice. Biolog and FAMEs were more believable and rapid methods. However, they need some complemental method for identification of some pathogenic bacteria due to their limited databases. Each method has its owns advantage and pitfalls.https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/1008-9209.2000.04.0353pathogenic bacteriaricebiologgas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esterspathogenicity test |
| spellingShingle | XIE Guan-lin Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice 浙江大学学报. 农业与生命科学版 pathogenic bacteria rice biolog gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters pathogenicity test |
| title | Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| title_full | Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| title_short | Comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| title_sort | comparison of different methods for identification of pathogenic bacteria from rice |
| topic | pathogenic bacteria rice biolog gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters pathogenicity test |
| url | https://www.academax.com/doi/10.3785/1008-9209.2000.04.0353 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xieguanlin comparisonofdifferentmethodsforidentificationofpathogenicbacteriafromrice |