COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS
This study compares the clinical outcomes of two methods for veneer application: the no-prep and prep approaches. A total of 170 patients (108 females, 62 males, mean age 45.2 years) were treated with veneers using either the no-prep or prep method. Clinical evaluations were based on criteria such a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://rjor.ro/comparative-analysis-of-clinical-performance-between-prep-and-no-prep-feldspathic-veneers-over-10-years/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832591426244837376 |
|---|---|
| author | Adrian Jantea Sorin Gheorghe Mihali Liliana Porojan Dan Lolos Anca Tudor Mihai Mitariu |
| author_facet | Adrian Jantea Sorin Gheorghe Mihali Liliana Porojan Dan Lolos Anca Tudor Mihai Mitariu |
| author_sort | Adrian Jantea |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study compares the clinical outcomes of two methods for veneer application: the no-prep and prep approaches. A total of 170 patients (108 females, 62 males, mean age 45.2 years) were treated with veneers using either the no-prep or prep method. Clinical evaluations were based on criteria such as esthetic anatomical form, occlusal contour and wear, and periodontal response, measured over a 10-year follow-up period. The results demonstrated that the no-prep method significantly outperformed the prep method in several key areas, including esthetic anatomical form (C3), occlusal contour and wear (C6), and periodontal response (C10), with p-values of 0.038, <0.001, and 0.001, respectively. The no-prep method also showed superior performance in terms of recurrent caries (C8). These findings suggest that the no-prep method provides notable advantages in both functionality and esthetics, leading to better long-term clinical outcomes compared to the prep method, when correctly applied to the patient case. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-23fa857e79804e48a49090456c76dfca |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2066-7000 2601-4661 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Romanian Society of Oral Rehabilitation |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation |
| spelling | doaj-art-23fa857e79804e48a49090456c76dfca2025-01-22T11:58:24ZengRomanian Society of Oral RehabilitationRomanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation2066-70002601-46612024-12-0116469470410.62610/RJOR.2024.4.16.67COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARSAdrian JanteaSorin Gheorghe MihaliLiliana PorojanDan LolosAnca TudorMihai MitariuThis study compares the clinical outcomes of two methods for veneer application: the no-prep and prep approaches. A total of 170 patients (108 females, 62 males, mean age 45.2 years) were treated with veneers using either the no-prep or prep method. Clinical evaluations were based on criteria such as esthetic anatomical form, occlusal contour and wear, and periodontal response, measured over a 10-year follow-up period. The results demonstrated that the no-prep method significantly outperformed the prep method in several key areas, including esthetic anatomical form (C3), occlusal contour and wear (C6), and periodontal response (C10), with p-values of 0.038, <0.001, and 0.001, respectively. The no-prep method also showed superior performance in terms of recurrent caries (C8). These findings suggest that the no-prep method provides notable advantages in both functionality and esthetics, leading to better long-term clinical outcomes compared to the prep method, when correctly applied to the patient case.https://rjor.ro/comparative-analysis-of-clinical-performance-between-prep-and-no-prep-feldspathic-veneers-over-10-years/no-prep methodprep methodfeldspathic veneersclinical outcomeslong-term performance |
| spellingShingle | Adrian Jantea Sorin Gheorghe Mihali Liliana Porojan Dan Lolos Anca Tudor Mihai Mitariu COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation no-prep method prep method feldspathic veneers clinical outcomes long-term performance |
| title | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS |
| title_full | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS |
| title_fullStr | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS |
| title_full_unstemmed | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS |
| title_short | COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL PERFORMANCE BETWEEN PREP AND NO-PREP FELDSPATHIC VENEERS OVER 10 YEARS |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of clinical performance between prep and no prep feldspathic veneers over 10 years |
| topic | no-prep method prep method feldspathic veneers clinical outcomes long-term performance |
| url | https://rjor.ro/comparative-analysis-of-clinical-performance-between-prep-and-no-prep-feldspathic-veneers-over-10-years/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adrianjantea comparativeanalysisofclinicalperformancebetweenprepandnoprepfeldspathicveneersover10years AT soringheorghemihali comparativeanalysisofclinicalperformancebetweenprepandnoprepfeldspathicveneersover10years AT lilianaporojan comparativeanalysisofclinicalperformancebetweenprepandnoprepfeldspathicveneersover10years AT danlolos comparativeanalysisofclinicalperformancebetweenprepandnoprepfeldspathicveneersover10years AT ancatudor comparativeanalysisofclinicalperformancebetweenprepandnoprepfeldspathicveneersover10years AT mihaimitariu comparativeanalysisofclinicalperformancebetweenprepandnoprepfeldspathicveneersover10years |