Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches

Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to examine the theoretical foundations of materiality research within sustainability reporting, the current state of research and the legitimacy of different approaches, and to compare between different normalizations and frameworks. Methodology/approach: E...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Anas Belidan, Halima Baghad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rada Naukowa SKwP 2024-12-01
Series:Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ztr.skwp.pl/gicid/01.3001.0054.8687
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560168079294464
author Mohamed Anas Belidan
Halima Baghad
author_facet Mohamed Anas Belidan
Halima Baghad
author_sort Mohamed Anas Belidan
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to examine the theoretical foundations of materiality research within sustainability reporting, the current state of research and the legitimacy of different approaches, and to compare between different normalizations and frameworks. Methodology/approach: Employing a content analysis approach, this study used a scoping review. Over 86 related papers were analyzed. Data were extracted from Scopus and Google Scholar on April 22, 2024. Findings: Our review reveals the growing importance of double materiality in sustainability reporting research, driven by stakeholders’ expectations and regulatory demands. Theoretical frameworks like stakeholder and legitimacy theory help explain the complexities in materiality assessments, while inconsistent standards highlight the need for harmonization. We emphasize the critical role of stakeholder engagement and call for further research on standardization, sector-specific challenges, and the implementation of double materiality. Research limitations: This article has certain limitations. Methodologically, it uses a limited set of search keywords. Regarding the findings, this study shows a scarcity of papers on materiality in sustainability reporting. Practical implications: This study aims to provide managers and public policymakers with insight into the degree to which materiality and double materiality are incorporated into essential elements of organizations, such as governance, stakeholder requirements, and social impact evaluations. Originality/value: As of the date this article was written, and to the extent of our knowledge, there are no existing research papers specifically using a scoping review on materiality assessment within this scope.
format Article
id doaj-art-20f978135567456e8d46838e2db6b3f6
institution Kabale University
issn 1641-4381
2391-677X
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Rada Naukowa SKwP
record_format Article
series Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości
spelling doaj-art-20f978135567456e8d46838e2db6b3f62025-01-04T19:09:25ZengRada Naukowa SKwPZeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości1641-43812391-677X2024-12-01484113210.5604/01.3001.0054.868701.3001.0054.8687Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approachesMohamed Anas Belidan0Halima Baghad1The Higher Institute of Commerce and Business Administration (Groupe ISCAE) Department of Finance Research (LAREF)), The Higher Institute of Commerce and Business Administration (Groupe ISCAE) Department of Finance Research (LAREF)Purpose: The purpose of this analysis is to examine the theoretical foundations of materiality research within sustainability reporting, the current state of research and the legitimacy of different approaches, and to compare between different normalizations and frameworks. Methodology/approach: Employing a content analysis approach, this study used a scoping review. Over 86 related papers were analyzed. Data were extracted from Scopus and Google Scholar on April 22, 2024. Findings: Our review reveals the growing importance of double materiality in sustainability reporting research, driven by stakeholders’ expectations and regulatory demands. Theoretical frameworks like stakeholder and legitimacy theory help explain the complexities in materiality assessments, while inconsistent standards highlight the need for harmonization. We emphasize the critical role of stakeholder engagement and call for further research on standardization, sector-specific challenges, and the implementation of double materiality. Research limitations: This article has certain limitations. Methodologically, it uses a limited set of search keywords. Regarding the findings, this study shows a scarcity of papers on materiality in sustainability reporting. Practical implications: This study aims to provide managers and public policymakers with insight into the degree to which materiality and double materiality are incorporated into essential elements of organizations, such as governance, stakeholder requirements, and social impact evaluations. Originality/value: As of the date this article was written, and to the extent of our knowledge, there are no existing research papers specifically using a scoping review on materiality assessment within this scope.http://ztr.skwp.pl/gicid/01.3001.0054.8687materialitydouble materialitysustainabilitysustainability reportingsustainability disclosure
spellingShingle Mohamed Anas Belidan
Halima Baghad
Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości
materiality
double materiality
sustainability
sustainability reporting
sustainability disclosure
title Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
title_full Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
title_fullStr Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
title_full_unstemmed Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
title_short Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
title_sort navigating materiality in sustainability reporting a scoping review of single and double materiality approaches
topic materiality
double materiality
sustainability
sustainability reporting
sustainability disclosure
url http://ztr.skwp.pl/gicid/01.3001.0054.8687
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedanasbelidan navigatingmaterialityinsustainabilityreportingascopingreviewofsingleanddoublematerialityapproaches
AT halimabaghad navigatingmaterialityinsustainabilityreportingascopingreviewofsingleanddoublematerialityapproaches