A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Purpose. To compare the anatomical and visual results and complications of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods. A prospective, propensity score-matched 6-month study was performed. All patients unde...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniele Veritti, Valentina Sarao, Paolo Lanzetta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3120960
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564454110265344
author Daniele Veritti
Valentina Sarao
Paolo Lanzetta
author_facet Daniele Veritti
Valentina Sarao
Paolo Lanzetta
author_sort Daniele Veritti
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the anatomical and visual results and complications of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods. A prospective, propensity score-matched 6-month study was performed. All patients underwent either 27-gauge or 25-gauge vitrectomy as the first surgical intervention and were followed up over a 6-month period, in order to evaluate anatomical success, change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraoperative and postoperative complications including intraocular pressure dysregulation. Results. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 37 eyes each. All eyes completed a six-month follow-up. Baseline demographic and preoperative ocular characteristics showed no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts. The single operation success rate was 33/37 (89%) for 27-gauge cases and 34/37 (92%) for 25-gauge cases (p=0.7). The final anatomical success rate was 100% for each of the two cohorts. Mean BCVA change at the 6-month postoperative follow-up visit was −0.67 logMAR in the 27-gauge group and −0.71 logMAR in the 25-gauge group (p=0.9). Two patients in the 25-gauge group experienced transient hypotony after surgery. Conclusion. No significant difference between 27-gauge and 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was recorded in terms of reattachment rate, BCVA, intraoperative and postoperative complications.
format Article
id doaj-art-20dad0012a224f62a0f96aeaff152d90
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-20dad0012a224f62a0f96aeaff152d902025-02-03T01:10:56ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582019-01-01201910.1155/2019/31209603120960A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentDaniele Veritti0Valentina Sarao1Paolo Lanzetta2Department of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, ItalyDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, ItalyDepartment of Medicine-Ophthalmology, University of Udine, Udine, ItalyPurpose. To compare the anatomical and visual results and complications of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Methods. A prospective, propensity score-matched 6-month study was performed. All patients underwent either 27-gauge or 25-gauge vitrectomy as the first surgical intervention and were followed up over a 6-month period, in order to evaluate anatomical success, change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraoperative and postoperative complications including intraocular pressure dysregulation. Results. Propensity score matching resulted in two groups of 37 eyes each. All eyes completed a six-month follow-up. Baseline demographic and preoperative ocular characteristics showed no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts. The single operation success rate was 33/37 (89%) for 27-gauge cases and 34/37 (92%) for 25-gauge cases (p=0.7). The final anatomical success rate was 100% for each of the two cohorts. Mean BCVA change at the 6-month postoperative follow-up visit was −0.67 logMAR in the 27-gauge group and −0.71 logMAR in the 25-gauge group (p=0.9). Two patients in the 25-gauge group experienced transient hypotony after surgery. Conclusion. No significant difference between 27-gauge and 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment was recorded in terms of reattachment rate, BCVA, intraoperative and postoperative complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3120960
spellingShingle Daniele Veritti
Valentina Sarao
Paolo Lanzetta
A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Journal of Ophthalmology
title A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_full A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_fullStr A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_full_unstemmed A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_short A Propensity-Score Matching Comparison between 27-Gauge and 25-Gauge Vitrectomy Systems for the Repair of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
title_sort propensity score matching comparison between 27 gauge and 25 gauge vitrectomy systems for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3120960
work_keys_str_mv AT danieleveritti apropensityscorematchingcomparisonbetween27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomysystemsfortherepairofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT valentinasarao apropensityscorematchingcomparisonbetween27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomysystemsfortherepairofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT paololanzetta apropensityscorematchingcomparisonbetween27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomysystemsfortherepairofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT danieleveritti propensityscorematchingcomparisonbetween27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomysystemsfortherepairofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT valentinasarao propensityscorematchingcomparisonbetween27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomysystemsfortherepairofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment
AT paololanzetta propensityscorematchingcomparisonbetween27gaugeand25gaugevitrectomysystemsfortherepairofprimaryrhegmatogenousretinaldetachment