Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in fatigue measured by Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)‐Fatigue scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received sarilumab and to assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clifton O. Bingham, Emily Molina, Amy Praestgaard, Stefano Fiore, David Cella
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:ACR Open Rheumatology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11763
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832542358788374528
author Clifton O. Bingham
Emily Molina
Amy Praestgaard
Stefano Fiore
David Cella
author_facet Clifton O. Bingham
Emily Molina
Amy Praestgaard
Stefano Fiore
David Cella
author_sort Clifton O. Bingham
collection DOAJ
description Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in fatigue measured by Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)‐Fatigue scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received sarilumab and to assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful change. Methods Data from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials of patients with RA who received sarilumab—MOBILITY, TARGET, and MONARCH—were evaluated. The 10 RA‐relevant items from the 13‐item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)‐Fatigue were scored in the PROMIS T score metric. Mean changes in 10‐item PROMIS‐Fatigue T score (PROMIS‐Fatigue 10a) were compared, proportions of patients reporting meaningful within‐person change thresholds were assessed, and results were visualized using empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) curves. Results Patients with RA reported high baseline fatigue. Using PROMIS‐Fatigue 10a, at week 24, patients receiving 150 or 200 mg sarilumab every other week in MOBILITY and TARGET had rapidly and significantly improved mean levels of fatigue compared to those who received placebo. When compared to patients who received adalimumab in MONARCH, patients who received sarilumab had a trend toward increased improvement. eCDF curves showed separation between active treatment versus placebo with both sarilumab doses and across the score range for improvement. Higher proportions of patients reported three‐, five‐, and seven‐point improvements in PROMIS‐Fatigue scores in groups who received active treatment. Conclusion Substantial proportions of patients with RA who received sarilumab reported meaningful change in fatigue measured by PROMIS‐Fatigue 10a over time. This study demonstrates the ability to convert FACIT‐Fatigue score onto the PROMIS T score metric, the rapid reduction in fatigue with biologic therapies, and the use of novel eCDF curves to show individual patient‐level change.
format Article
id doaj-art-1f81ee28c58843728618d2ff2ea74eb9
institution Kabale University
issn 2578-5745
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ACR Open Rheumatology
spelling doaj-art-1f81ee28c58843728618d2ff2ea74eb92025-02-04T06:21:23ZengWileyACR Open Rheumatology2578-57452025-01-0171n/an/a10.1002/acr2.11763Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid ArthritisClifton O. Bingham0Emily Molina1Amy Praestgaard2Stefano Fiore3David Cella4John Hopkins University Baltimore MarylandJohn Hopkins University Baltimore MarylandSanofi Pharmaceuticals Cambridge MassachusettsSanofi Pharmaceuticals Cambridge MassachusettsNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IllinoisObjective The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in fatigue measured by Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)‐Fatigue scores in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received sarilumab and to assess the proportion of patients achieving clinically meaningful change. Methods Data from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials of patients with RA who received sarilumab—MOBILITY, TARGET, and MONARCH—were evaluated. The 10 RA‐relevant items from the 13‐item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)‐Fatigue were scored in the PROMIS T score metric. Mean changes in 10‐item PROMIS‐Fatigue T score (PROMIS‐Fatigue 10a) were compared, proportions of patients reporting meaningful within‐person change thresholds were assessed, and results were visualized using empirical cumulative distribution function (eCDF) curves. Results Patients with RA reported high baseline fatigue. Using PROMIS‐Fatigue 10a, at week 24, patients receiving 150 or 200 mg sarilumab every other week in MOBILITY and TARGET had rapidly and significantly improved mean levels of fatigue compared to those who received placebo. When compared to patients who received adalimumab in MONARCH, patients who received sarilumab had a trend toward increased improvement. eCDF curves showed separation between active treatment versus placebo with both sarilumab doses and across the score range for improvement. Higher proportions of patients reported three‐, five‐, and seven‐point improvements in PROMIS‐Fatigue scores in groups who received active treatment. Conclusion Substantial proportions of patients with RA who received sarilumab reported meaningful change in fatigue measured by PROMIS‐Fatigue 10a over time. This study demonstrates the ability to convert FACIT‐Fatigue score onto the PROMIS T score metric, the rapid reduction in fatigue with biologic therapies, and the use of novel eCDF curves to show individual patient‐level change.https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11763
spellingShingle Clifton O. Bingham
Emily Molina
Amy Praestgaard
Stefano Fiore
David Cella
Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
ACR Open Rheumatology
title Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_fullStr Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_short Evaluating Meaningful Changes in Patient‐Reported Outcome Measurement Information System–Fatigue Scores from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Sarilumab for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
title_sort evaluating meaningful changes in patient reported outcome measurement information system fatigue scores from three phase 3 clinical trials of sarilumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11763
work_keys_str_mv AT cliftonobingham evaluatingmeaningfulchangesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasurementinformationsystemfatiguescoresfromthreephase3clinicaltrialsofsarilumabforpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT emilymolina evaluatingmeaningfulchangesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasurementinformationsystemfatiguescoresfromthreephase3clinicaltrialsofsarilumabforpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT amypraestgaard evaluatingmeaningfulchangesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasurementinformationsystemfatiguescoresfromthreephase3clinicaltrialsofsarilumabforpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT stefanofiore evaluatingmeaningfulchangesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasurementinformationsystemfatiguescoresfromthreephase3clinicaltrialsofsarilumabforpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT davidcella evaluatingmeaningfulchangesinpatientreportedoutcomemeasurementinformationsystemfatiguescoresfromthreephase3clinicaltrialsofsarilumabforpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis