Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5

Neutronics analysis has been performed for the 500 kW Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor loaded with highly enriched uranium fuel using the SRAC code system. The effective multiplication factors, keff, were analyzed for the core at criticality conditions and in two cases corresponding to the complete wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giang Phan, Hoai-Nam Tran, Kien-Cuong Nguyen, Viet-Phu Tran, Van-Khanh Hoang, Pham Nhu Viet Ha, Hoang Anh Tuan Kiet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2615409
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560999418298368
author Giang Phan
Hoai-Nam Tran
Kien-Cuong Nguyen
Viet-Phu Tran
Van-Khanh Hoang
Pham Nhu Viet Ha
Hoang Anh Tuan Kiet
author_facet Giang Phan
Hoai-Nam Tran
Kien-Cuong Nguyen
Viet-Phu Tran
Van-Khanh Hoang
Pham Nhu Viet Ha
Hoang Anh Tuan Kiet
author_sort Giang Phan
collection DOAJ
description Neutronics analysis has been performed for the 500 kW Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor loaded with highly enriched uranium fuel using the SRAC code system. The effective multiplication factors, keff, were analyzed for the core at criticality conditions and in two cases corresponding to the complete withdrawal and the full insertion of control rods. MCNP5 calculations were also conducted and compared to that obtained with the SRAC code. The results show that the difference of the keff values between the codes is within 55 pcm. Compared to the criticality conditions established in the experiments, the maximum differences of the keff values obtained from the SRAC and MCNP5 calculations are 119 pcm and 64 pcm, respectively. The radial and axial power peaking factors are 1.334 and 1.710, respectively, in the case of no control rod insertion. At the criticality condition these values become 1.445 and 1.832 when the control rods are partially inserted. Compared to MCNP5 calculations, the deviation of the relative power densities is less than 4% at the fuel bundles in the middle of the core, while the maximum deviation is about 7% appearing at some peripheral bundles. This agreement indicates the verification of the analysis models.
format Article
id doaj-art-1a986050c1b44025a1b29fa2c620d69e
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
spelling doaj-art-1a986050c1b44025a1b29fa2c620d69e2025-02-03T01:26:06ZengWileyScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832017-01-01201710.1155/2017/26154092615409Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5Giang Phan0Hoai-Nam Tran1Kien-Cuong Nguyen2Viet-Phu Tran3Van-Khanh Hoang4Pham Nhu Viet Ha5Hoang Anh Tuan Kiet6Faculty of Applied Sciences, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, VietnamInstitute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan University, 3 Quang Trung, Da Nang 550000, VietnamNuclear Research Institute, VINATOM, 01 Nguyen Tu Luc, Dalat, Lamdong 670000, VietnamInstitute for Nuclear Science and Technology, VINATOM, 179 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi 100000, VietnamInstitute for Nuclear Science and Technology, VINATOM, 179 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi 100000, VietnamInstitute for Nuclear Science and Technology, VINATOM, 179 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi 100000, VietnamInstitute of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, Duy Tan University, 3 Quang Trung, Da Nang 550000, VietnamNeutronics analysis has been performed for the 500 kW Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor loaded with highly enriched uranium fuel using the SRAC code system. The effective multiplication factors, keff, were analyzed for the core at criticality conditions and in two cases corresponding to the complete withdrawal and the full insertion of control rods. MCNP5 calculations were also conducted and compared to that obtained with the SRAC code. The results show that the difference of the keff values between the codes is within 55 pcm. Compared to the criticality conditions established in the experiments, the maximum differences of the keff values obtained from the SRAC and MCNP5 calculations are 119 pcm and 64 pcm, respectively. The radial and axial power peaking factors are 1.334 and 1.710, respectively, in the case of no control rod insertion. At the criticality condition these values become 1.445 and 1.832 when the control rods are partially inserted. Compared to MCNP5 calculations, the deviation of the relative power densities is less than 4% at the fuel bundles in the middle of the core, while the maximum deviation is about 7% appearing at some peripheral bundles. This agreement indicates the verification of the analysis models.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2615409
spellingShingle Giang Phan
Hoai-Nam Tran
Kien-Cuong Nguyen
Viet-Phu Tran
Van-Khanh Hoang
Pham Nhu Viet Ha
Hoang Anh Tuan Kiet
Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
title Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Dalat Nuclear Research Reactor with HEU Fuel Using SRAC and MCNP5
title_sort comparative analysis of the dalat nuclear research reactor with heu fuel using srac and mcnp5
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/2615409
work_keys_str_mv AT giangphan comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5
AT hoainamtran comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5
AT kiencuongnguyen comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5
AT vietphutran comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5
AT vankhanhhoang comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5
AT phamnhuvietha comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5
AT hoanganhtuankiet comparativeanalysisofthedalatnuclearresearchreactorwithheufuelusingsracandmcnp5