Rationale and Design of the REPEAT Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Rationale and Design of the REPEAT Trial: A Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Valve‐in‐Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background Redo surgical aortic valve replacement (rSAVR) has for long been the therapeutic reference standard for degenerated surgical aortic bioprostheses. Valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV‐TAVR) has emerged as an alternative for patients at high surgical risk due to its l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthias Raschpichler, Suzanne de Waha, Stefan Blankenberg, Marcio A. Diniz, Emilia Bagiella, Annetine C. Gelijns, Vinicius F. Calsavara, Aakriti Gupta, Niklas Schofer, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Holger Thiele, Raj Makkar, Michael A. Borger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
aortic stenosis
failed surgical aortic bioprosthesis
redo surgical aortic valve replacement
valve‐in‐valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement
structural valve deterioration
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.125.040954
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Internet

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.125.040954

Similar Items