Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data

Abstract We compared the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX)—standard first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan. This retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated at the National Ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akira Shinohara, Yuki Takumoto, Junko Tauchi, Koki Morishita, Toshikatsu Kawasaki, Manabu Akazawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80549-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559714833367040
author Akira Shinohara
Yuki Takumoto
Junko Tauchi
Koki Morishita
Toshikatsu Kawasaki
Manabu Akazawa
author_facet Akira Shinohara
Yuki Takumoto
Junko Tauchi
Koki Morishita
Toshikatsu Kawasaki
Manabu Akazawa
author_sort Akira Shinohara
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We compared the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX)—standard first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan. This retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital East in Japan between December 2013 and February 2017. A partitioned survival model, featuring five mutually exclusive health states, was developed. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to obtain total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). A 2% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Parameter uncertainty effect was assessed using a one-way sensitivity analysis. mFFX treatment involved intravenous infusions of oxaliplatin, levofolinate, and irinotecan, whereas GnP treatment involved weekly intravenous administration of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Dosages were adjusted based on observed adverse events. The total costs of the mFFX and GnP arms were JPY 3,193,597 (USD 31,006) and JPY 3,913,171 (USD 37,992), respectively. Incremental total costs of JPY 719,574 (USD 6,986) were associated with GnP compared to mFFX. Total QALYs were 0.427 and 0.435 for mFFX and GnP, respectively. Therefore, GnP has slightly higher QALYs than mFFX in Japanese real-world clinical practice, suggesting it has a potentially better safety profile, although the impact on healthcare costs persists.
format Article
id doaj-art-17a87558d0cf4a8cb5e2026e2175e030
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-17a87558d0cf4a8cb5e2026e2175e0302025-01-05T12:14:57ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-011511910.1038/s41598-024-80549-1Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical dataAkira Shinohara0Yuki Takumoto1Junko Tauchi2Koki Morishita3Toshikatsu Kawasaki4Manabu Akazawa5Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital EastDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Meiji Pharmaceutical UniversityDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital EastDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital EastDepartment of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital EastDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Meiji Pharmaceutical UniversityAbstract We compared the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and modified FOLFIRINOX (mFFX)—standard first-line treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer in Japan. This retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital East in Japan between December 2013 and February 2017. A partitioned survival model, featuring five mutually exclusive health states, was developed. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to obtain total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). A 2% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Parameter uncertainty effect was assessed using a one-way sensitivity analysis. mFFX treatment involved intravenous infusions of oxaliplatin, levofolinate, and irinotecan, whereas GnP treatment involved weekly intravenous administration of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Dosages were adjusted based on observed adverse events. The total costs of the mFFX and GnP arms were JPY 3,193,597 (USD 31,006) and JPY 3,913,171 (USD 37,992), respectively. Incremental total costs of JPY 719,574 (USD 6,986) were associated with GnP compared to mFFX. Total QALYs were 0.427 and 0.435 for mFFX and GnP, respectively. Therefore, GnP has slightly higher QALYs than mFFX in Japanese real-world clinical practice, suggesting it has a potentially better safety profile, although the impact on healthcare costs persists.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80549-1Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxelModified FOLFIRINOXPancreatic cancerChemotherapyCost-effectiveness
spellingShingle Akira Shinohara
Yuki Takumoto
Junko Tauchi
Koki Morishita
Toshikatsu Kawasaki
Manabu Akazawa
Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
Scientific Reports
Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel
Modified FOLFIRINOX
Pancreatic cancer
Chemotherapy
Cost-effectiveness
title Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
title_full Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
title_short Cost-effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study using Japanese clinical data
title_sort cost effectiveness of systematic chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer a retrospective study using japanese clinical data
topic Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel
Modified FOLFIRINOX
Pancreatic cancer
Chemotherapy
Cost-effectiveness
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80549-1
work_keys_str_mv AT akirashinohara costeffectivenessofsystematicchemotherapyformetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseclinicaldata
AT yukitakumoto costeffectivenessofsystematicchemotherapyformetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseclinicaldata
AT junkotauchi costeffectivenessofsystematicchemotherapyformetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseclinicaldata
AT kokimorishita costeffectivenessofsystematicchemotherapyformetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseclinicaldata
AT toshikatsukawasaki costeffectivenessofsystematicchemotherapyformetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseclinicaldata
AT manabuakazawa costeffectivenessofsystematicchemotherapyformetastaticpancreaticcanceraretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseclinicaldata