On Erdős sums of almost primes

In 1935, Erdős proved that the sums $f_k=\sum _n 1/(n\log n)$, over integers $n$ with exactly $k$ prime factors, are bounded by an absolute constant, and in 1993 Zhang proved that $f_k$ is maximized by the prime sum $f_1=\sum _p 1/(p\log p)$. According to a 2013 conjecture of Banks and Martin, the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gorodetsky, Ofir, Lichtman, Jared Duker, Wong, Mo Dick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Académie des sciences 2024-11-01
Series:Comptes Rendus. Mathématique
Subjects:
Online Access:https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/mathematique/articles/10.5802/crmath.650/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1825206130724306944
author Gorodetsky, Ofir
Lichtman, Jared Duker
Wong, Mo Dick
author_facet Gorodetsky, Ofir
Lichtman, Jared Duker
Wong, Mo Dick
author_sort Gorodetsky, Ofir
collection DOAJ
description In 1935, Erdős proved that the sums $f_k=\sum _n 1/(n\log n)$, over integers $n$ with exactly $k$ prime factors, are bounded by an absolute constant, and in 1993 Zhang proved that $f_k$ is maximized by the prime sum $f_1=\sum _p 1/(p\log p)$. According to a 2013 conjecture of Banks and Martin, the sums $f_k$ are predicted to decrease monotonically in $k$. In this article, we show that the sums restricted to odd integers are indeed monotonically decreasing in $k$, sufficiently large. By contrast, contrary to the conjecture we prove that the sums $f_k$ increase monotonically in $k$, sufficiently large.Our main result gives an asymptotic for $f_k$ which identifies the (negative) secondary term, namely $f_k = 1 - (a+o(1))k^2/2^k$ for an explicit constant $a= 0.0656\cdots $. This is proven by a refined method combining real and complex analysis, whereas the classical results of Sathe and Selberg on products of $k$ primes imply the weaker estimate $f_k=1+O_{\varepsilon }(k^{\varepsilon -1/2})$. We also give an alternate, probability-theoretic argument related to the Dickman distribution. Here the proof reduces to showing a sequence of integrals converges exponentially quickly $\mathrm{e}^{-\gamma }$, which may be of independent interest.
format Article
id doaj-art-08e4bdc305b8413db491aded4972df72
institution Kabale University
issn 1778-3569
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher Académie des sciences
record_format Article
series Comptes Rendus. Mathématique
spelling doaj-art-08e4bdc305b8413db491aded4972df722025-02-07T11:26:37ZengAcadémie des sciencesComptes Rendus. Mathématique1778-35692024-11-01362G121571159610.5802/crmath.65010.5802/crmath.650On Erdős sums of almost primesGorodetsky, Ofir0Lichtman, Jared Duker1Wong, Mo Dick2Department of Mathematics, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel; Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UKDepartment of Mathematics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USADepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UKIn 1935, Erdős proved that the sums $f_k=\sum _n 1/(n\log n)$, over integers $n$ with exactly $k$ prime factors, are bounded by an absolute constant, and in 1993 Zhang proved that $f_k$ is maximized by the prime sum $f_1=\sum _p 1/(p\log p)$. According to a 2013 conjecture of Banks and Martin, the sums $f_k$ are predicted to decrease monotonically in $k$. In this article, we show that the sums restricted to odd integers are indeed monotonically decreasing in $k$, sufficiently large. By contrast, contrary to the conjecture we prove that the sums $f_k$ increase monotonically in $k$, sufficiently large.Our main result gives an asymptotic for $f_k$ which identifies the (negative) secondary term, namely $f_k = 1 - (a+o(1))k^2/2^k$ for an explicit constant $a= 0.0656\cdots $. This is proven by a refined method combining real and complex analysis, whereas the classical results of Sathe and Selberg on products of $k$ primes imply the weaker estimate $f_k=1+O_{\varepsilon }(k^{\varepsilon -1/2})$. We also give an alternate, probability-theoretic argument related to the Dickman distribution. Here the proof reduces to showing a sequence of integrals converges exponentially quickly $\mathrm{e}^{-\gamma }$, which may be of independent interest.https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/mathematique/articles/10.5802/crmath.650/Almost primesprimitive setDickman distributionrecursive distributional equation
spellingShingle Gorodetsky, Ofir
Lichtman, Jared Duker
Wong, Mo Dick
On Erdős sums of almost primes
Comptes Rendus. Mathématique
Almost primes
primitive set
Dickman distribution
recursive distributional equation
title On Erdős sums of almost primes
title_full On Erdős sums of almost primes
title_fullStr On Erdős sums of almost primes
title_full_unstemmed On Erdős sums of almost primes
title_short On Erdős sums of almost primes
title_sort on erdos sums of almost primes
topic Almost primes
primitive set
Dickman distribution
recursive distributional equation
url https://comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr/mathematique/articles/10.5802/crmath.650/
work_keys_str_mv AT gorodetskyofir onerdossumsofalmostprimes
AT lichtmanjaredduker onerdossumsofalmostprimes
AT wongmodick onerdossumsofalmostprimes