Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study

Aim. Alveolar deficiency is considered one of the main limitations for placement of osseointegrated implants, as well as for their long-term success, especially in the anterior region of the maxilla. Objective. To report a clinical case of reconstruction of atrophic maxilla with deproteinized bovine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Graziele Parize, Samy Tunchel, Alberto Blay, Eduardo Felippe Duailibi-Neto, Yeon Jung Kim, Debora Pallos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3412190
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552683085496320
author Graziele Parize
Samy Tunchel
Alberto Blay
Eduardo Felippe Duailibi-Neto
Yeon Jung Kim
Debora Pallos
author_facet Graziele Parize
Samy Tunchel
Alberto Blay
Eduardo Felippe Duailibi-Neto
Yeon Jung Kim
Debora Pallos
author_sort Graziele Parize
collection DOAJ
description Aim. Alveolar deficiency is considered one of the main limitations for placement of osseointegrated implants, as well as for their long-term success, especially in the anterior region of the maxilla. Objective. To report a clinical case of reconstruction of atrophic maxilla with deproteinized bovine bone associated with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and titanium mesh and to assess the linear and volumetric bone gains and rehabilitation with implants in a 5-year follow-up. Case. Patient with bone deficiency in the anterior maxilla region underwent bone reconstruction with deproteinized bovine bone associated with PRF and titanium mesh. After six months, the necessary bone height and volume were obtained for placement of implants, and the bone contour was restored in the anterior region, providing functional and aesthetic improvement. The amount of linear and volumetric bone gains was compared to baseline computed tomography scans. Three implants were placed in the grafted region, and a bone tissue sample was obtained at the time of their placement. Histological analysis showed neo-formed bone tissue in contact with the remaining particles of the biomaterial. After six months, the implants were activated, and the prosthesis was placed on the implants, which were monitored for five years. Conclusion. Implants can be placed predictably in regions with vertical and horizontal bone augmentations by using xenogeneic bone grafts associated with titanium mesh and PRF.
format Article
id doaj-art-06d059547eac4902b204461f9b2fdf7f
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-6455
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-06d059547eac4902b204461f9b2fdf7f2025-02-03T05:57:56ZengWileyCase Reports in Dentistry2090-64552022-01-01202210.1155/2022/3412190Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up StudyGraziele Parize0Samy Tunchel1Alberto Blay2Eduardo Felippe Duailibi-Neto3Yeon Jung Kim4Debora Pallos5University of Santo AmaroPrivate OfficePrivate OfficePrivate OfficeUniversity of Santo AmaroUniversity of Santo AmaroAim. Alveolar deficiency is considered one of the main limitations for placement of osseointegrated implants, as well as for their long-term success, especially in the anterior region of the maxilla. Objective. To report a clinical case of reconstruction of atrophic maxilla with deproteinized bovine bone associated with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and titanium mesh and to assess the linear and volumetric bone gains and rehabilitation with implants in a 5-year follow-up. Case. Patient with bone deficiency in the anterior maxilla region underwent bone reconstruction with deproteinized bovine bone associated with PRF and titanium mesh. After six months, the necessary bone height and volume were obtained for placement of implants, and the bone contour was restored in the anterior region, providing functional and aesthetic improvement. The amount of linear and volumetric bone gains was compared to baseline computed tomography scans. Three implants were placed in the grafted region, and a bone tissue sample was obtained at the time of their placement. Histological analysis showed neo-formed bone tissue in contact with the remaining particles of the biomaterial. After six months, the implants were activated, and the prosthesis was placed on the implants, which were monitored for five years. Conclusion. Implants can be placed predictably in regions with vertical and horizontal bone augmentations by using xenogeneic bone grafts associated with titanium mesh and PRF.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3412190
spellingShingle Graziele Parize
Samy Tunchel
Alberto Blay
Eduardo Felippe Duailibi-Neto
Yeon Jung Kim
Debora Pallos
Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study
Case Reports in Dentistry
title Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study
title_full Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study
title_short Maxillary Reconstruction with Xenogeneic Bone Graft, Platelet-Rich Fibrin, and Titanium Mesh for Rehabilitation with Implants: A 5-year Follow-Up Study
title_sort maxillary reconstruction with xenogeneic bone graft platelet rich fibrin and titanium mesh for rehabilitation with implants a 5 year follow up study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3412190
work_keys_str_mv AT grazieleparize maxillaryreconstructionwithxenogeneicbonegraftplateletrichfibrinandtitaniummeshforrehabilitationwithimplantsa5yearfollowupstudy
AT samytunchel maxillaryreconstructionwithxenogeneicbonegraftplateletrichfibrinandtitaniummeshforrehabilitationwithimplantsa5yearfollowupstudy
AT albertoblay maxillaryreconstructionwithxenogeneicbonegraftplateletrichfibrinandtitaniummeshforrehabilitationwithimplantsa5yearfollowupstudy
AT eduardofelippeduailibineto maxillaryreconstructionwithxenogeneicbonegraftplateletrichfibrinandtitaniummeshforrehabilitationwithimplantsa5yearfollowupstudy
AT yeonjungkim maxillaryreconstructionwithxenogeneicbonegraftplateletrichfibrinandtitaniummeshforrehabilitationwithimplantsa5yearfollowupstudy
AT deborapallos maxillaryreconstructionwithxenogeneicbonegraftplateletrichfibrinandtitaniummeshforrehabilitationwithimplantsa5yearfollowupstudy