Examining the jurisprudential and legal foundations of the unified opinions No. 733 and 810 of the Supreme Court, with an emphasis on the theory of "expectation damages" in Common Law, and its comparison with Iranian law and Imami jurisprudence.

The Unified Precedent Ruling No. 811 of the Supreme Court, which to some extent elucidates certain aspects of Unified Precedent Ruling No. 733, has been critically examined from various perspectives, particularly regarding its legal foundations. In this ruling, the Supreme Court adopted the criterio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: ali yarinejad
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Qom 2025-06-01
Series:پژوهش‌های فقهی مسائل مستحدثه
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rcjl.qom.ac.ir/article_3482_d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!